Direction: The following item features one part of a sentence followed by four alternatives. Complete the sentence by choosing the correct alternative.
They were informed that the inaugural version of the scheme
- AOption (a)
had three parts.
- BOption (b)
was three parts.
- COption (c)
have three parts.
- DOption (d)
had has three parts.
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
had three parts.
Why this answer is correct
The correct answer is 'had three parts.'.
Key Points
- The sentence is in the past tense because it refers to something that happened in the past.
- Specifically, it says "They were informed," which implies that someone told them about the inaugural version of the scheme in the past.
- Therefore, the correct verb form to use after "inaugural version of the scheme" is "had," which is the past tense of "have."
- Hence, the correct answer is Option 1.
Additional Information
- Option 2) "was three parts" is not correct because "was" is the past tense of "is," which is not the correct verb to use in this context. The inaugural version of the scheme is not a singular entity that can be described as "is" or "was," so this option is not grammatically correct.
- Option 3) "have three parts" is not correct because "have" is the present tense of the verb and does not match the past tense of the sentence. Using "have" in this context would suggest that the inaugural version of the scheme still exists, which is not what the sentence implies.
- Option 4) "had has three parts" is not correct because it is redundant and ungrammatical to use "had" and "has" together. "Has" is the present tense of "have," and using it in this sentence would suggest that the inaugural version of the scheme still exists, which is not what the sentence implies. Using both "had" and "has" together creates a grammatically incorrect sentence.