Which of the following is NOT the aim to establish the Directive Principles of State Policy?
- AOption (a)
Welfare state
- BOption (b)
Economic democracy
- COption (c)
Social democracy
- DOption (d)
Political democracy
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
Political democracy
Why this answer is correct
The correct answer is Political democracy.
Key Points
- The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) are enshrined in Part IV of the Indian Constitution and aim to create a framework for establishing a welfare state by guiding the government in policy-making and legislation. These principles are not enforceable by law but are fundamental in governance.
- The primary objectives of the DPSP include achieving social justice, ensuring economic democracy, and fostering social democracy. These are necessary for reducing inequalities in wealth, income, and opportunities.
- Political democracy, while an essential aspect of a democratic state, is not specifically addressed as an aim of the Directive Principles. Political democracy primarily concerns free and fair elections, individual rights, and political freedoms, which are guaranteed by other parts of the Constitution, notably the Fundamental Rights in Part III.
- The DPSP focuses on promoting an equitable society through measures like equal pay for equal work, protection of workers, promotion of education, public health, and living standards, and reducing the concentration of wealth (Articles 38–51).
- Thus, the goal of political democracy is distinct from the aims of the Directive Principles, which are more oriented towards creating a welfare state and ensuring economic and social justice. Hence, the correct answer is Political democracy.
Additional Information
- Directive Principles of State Policy:
- The DPSP are inspired by the Irish Constitution, which in turn drew from the directive principles of social policy in the Spanish Constitution.
- These principles aim at ensuring socio-economic justice and serve as a guide for the state to establish policies that reduce disparities and ensure overall development.
- Examples include provisions for free and compulsory education for children (Article 45) and the promotion of the welfare of people through economic justice (Article 38).
- Fundamental Rights and Political Democracy:
- Political democracy is primarily upheld through Fundamental Rights (Part III) like the right to equality (Article 14–18), the right to freedom (Article 19–22), and the right to constitutional remedies (Article 32).
- These rights ensure that citizens can freely participate in the political process, express opinions, and seek protection against state excesses.
- Political democracy also involves periodic free and fair elections, which are conducted under the supervision of the Election Commission of India.
- Key Articles of DPSP:
- Article 38: Directs the state to promote the welfare of the people by securing a social order marked by justice – social, economic, and political.
- Article 39: Calls for ensuring that the ownership and control of resources are distributed to serve the common good.
- Article 41: Directs the state to make effective provisions for securing the right to work, education, and public assistance.
- Comparison of DPSP and Fundamental Rights:
- Fundamental Rights are justiciable, meaning they are enforceable by courts, whereas DPSP are non-justiciable but act as guiding principles for governance.
- Fundamental Rights focus more on individual freedoms, while DPSP aims to achieve collective welfare.
Important Points
- Implementation of DPSP:
- Many laws and policies in India, such as the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA), the Mid-Day Meal Scheme, and the Right to Education Act, derive inspiration from the DPSP.
- The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments for local self-governance also reflect the spirit of the DPSP.
- Challenges in Implementing DPSP:
- Lack of adequate resources and political will often hampers the realization of these principles.
- Balancing DPSP with Fundamental Rights can sometimes lead to conflicts, as seen in cases like the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973).