SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) · Topic Collection

English Comprehension PYQs

Reading comprehension, vocabulary, synonyms and antonyms, idiom usage, error spotting, sentence improvement, and cloze tests.

7100 Total Questions284 Official PapersYears: 2017–2025Search in English Comprehension
Showing questions 541–560 of 7100Page 28 of 100
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 541

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage: The relationship between morality and legality is neither linear nor synonymous. Though often conflated in everyday discourse, they belong to distinct conceptual realms. Legality refers to conformity with codified rules enforced by the state, whereas morality is guided by principles of right and wrong, which are often subjective and culturally contingent. The divergence between what is legal and what is moral forms one of the most enduring dilemmas in jurisprudence and civil ethics. Laws, by their very nature, are prescriptive and institutionalized, grounded in the need for order, predictability, and enforceability. Yet, legal codes are ultimately constructed within specific historical, political, and social contexts, and thus may reflect prevailing power structures more than universal justice. For instance, colonial laws legalizing racial segregation or past statutes criminalizing homosexuality demonstrate how legality can institutionalize what many later recognize as moral failures. Conversely, acts of civil disobedience—illegal by definition—often draw moral legitimacy from a higher ethical calling. Mahatma Gandhi's Salt March or Rosa Parks' defiance on a segregated bus were technically unlawful, yet they served as moral catalysts for transformative legal reform. This underscores a vital point: legality does not always equate to justice, and at times, morality must challenge the law to realign it with evolving human values. However, conflating morality with legality can be equally dangerous. In pluralistic societies, what constitutes "moral" varies widely across cultures, religions, and ideologies. If law were to enforce a singular moral worldview, it would risk descending into authoritarianism or theocracy. Hence, modern democratic legal systems are designed to be procedurally neutral, relying on constitutional frameworks that protect individual rights while accommodating moral diversity. The tension between morality and legality is also palpable in emerging debates around technology, bioethics, and freedom of expression. Laws often lag behind technological advances, creating grey zones where ethical concerns arise before legal clarity is established. Consider data privacy or artificial intelligence—practices that may be legal today but pose moral quandaries about consent, autonomy, and manipulation. Ultimately, an ideal legal system should neither operate in moral vacuum nor serve as a mere extension of moral absolutism. Instead, it must strike a delicate balance—upholding constitutional values while remaining responsive to the ethical pulse of the time. Citizens, too, bear a responsibility: to not only obey the law but to question it when it stagnates or strays from principles of justice.

What central idea does the passage emphasize about legality?

  1. AOption (a)

    It is always aligned with morality

  2. BOption (b)

    It should be based solely on religious values

  3. COption (c)

    It is contextually shaped and not always just

  4. DOption (d)

    It evolves without societal influence

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (c)C.

It is contextually shaped and not always just

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is Option 3.

 

Key Points

  • The passage explicitly states that "legal codes are ultimately constructed within specific historical, political, and social contexts."
  • It provides examples such as colonial laws on racial segregation and statutes criminalizing homosexuality to show that legality can sometimes "institutionalize what many later recognize as moral failures."
  • The author highlights a "vital point" that "legality does not always equate to justice."
  • This aligns perfectly with Option 3, which captures both the contextual nature of law and its potential for injustice.

Therefore, the correct answer is 3.

 

 

Analytical Insight: In competitive exams, reading comprehension often explores philosophical tensions. The passage argues that while laws provide "order" and "predictability," they are not infallible. The mention of Mahatma Gandhi and Rosa Parks serves as evidence that progress often requires breaking the law to achieve a higher moral justice.

 

Additional Information

  • Option 1: "Always aligned with morality" – Contradicted by the text, which says the relationship is "neither linear nor synonymous."
  • Option 2: "Based solely on religious values" – Contradicted by the text, which warns that enforcing a singular moral worldview risks "theocracy."
  • Option 4: "Evolves without societal influence" – Contradicted by the text, which states laws are constructed within "social contexts."
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 542

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage: The relationship between morality and legality is neither linear nor synonymous. Though often conflated in everyday discourse, they belong to distinct conceptual realms. Legality refers to conformity with codified rules enforced by the state, whereas morality is guided by principles of right and wrong, which are often subjective and culturally contingent. The divergence between what is legal and what is moral forms one of the most enduring dilemmas in jurisprudence and civil ethics. Laws, by their very nature, are prescriptive and institutionalized, grounded in the need for order, predictability, and enforceability. Yet, legal codes are ultimately constructed within specific historical, political, and social contexts, and thus may reflect prevailing power structures more than universal justice. For instance, colonial laws legalizing racial segregation or past statutes criminalizing homosexuality demonstrate how legality can institutionalize what many later recognize as moral failures. Conversely, acts of civil disobedience—illegal by definition—often draw moral legitimacy from a higher ethical calling. Mahatma Gandhi's Salt March or Rosa Parks' defiance on a segregated bus were technically unlawful, yet they served as moral catalysts for transformative legal reform. This underscores a vital point: legality does not always equate to justice, and at times, morality must challenge the law to realign it with evolving human values. However, conflating morality with legality can be equally dangerous. In pluralistic societies, what constitutes "moral" varies widely across cultures, religions, and ideologies. If law were to enforce a singular moral worldview, it would risk descending into authoritarianism or theocracy. Hence, modern democratic legal systems are designed to be procedurally neutral, relying on constitutional frameworks that protect individual rights while accommodating moral diversity. The tension between morality and legality is also palpable in emerging debates around technology, bioethics, and freedom of expression. Laws often lag behind technological advances, creating grey zones where ethical concerns arise before legal clarity is established. Consider data privacy or artificial intelligence—practices that may be legal today but pose moral quandaries about consent, autonomy, and manipulation. Ultimately, an ideal legal system should neither operate in moral vacuum nor serve as a mere extension of moral absolutism. Instead, it must strike a delicate balance—upholding constitutional values while remaining responsive to the ethical pulse of the time. Citizens, too, bear a responsibility: to not only obey the law but to question it when it stagnates or strays from principles of justice.

Why does the author mention acts like Gandhi's Salt March and Rosa Parks' defiance?

  1. AOption (a)

    To show how legal systems support all moral actions

  2. BOption (b)

    To illustrate when legal disobedience is morally valid

  3. COption (c)

    To argue for stricter law enforcement

  4. DOption (d)

    To show that all moral actions are illegal

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

To illustrate when legal disobedience is morally valid

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is Option 2.

 

Key Points

  • The author introduces Mahatma Gandhi's Salt March and Rosa Parks' defiance as specific examples of "civil disobedience."
  • The passage defines these acts as "technically unlawful" (illegal by definition), yet argues that they "draw moral legitimacy from a higher ethical calling."
  • The purpose of these examples is to demonstrate that there are instances where the law is unjust, and breaking it is necessary to act as a "moral catalyst" for legal reform.
  • This directly supports Option 2, as it illustrates that legal disobedience can be morally valid when the law itself fails to reflect justice.

Therefore, the correct answer is 2.

 

 

Analytical Insight: In competitive exams, examples of historical figures are often used to test your understanding of the author's argumentative strategy. Here, the author uses these figures to prove that morality and legality are not always in sync. Option 4 is a "trap" because while these specific moral actions were illegal, the author never suggests that all moral actions must be illegal.

 

Additional Information

  • Option 1: "Legal systems support all moral actions" – Incorrect; the passage highlights that legal systems sometimes institutionalize "moral failures" (like segregation).
  • Option 3: "Argue for stricter law enforcement" – Incorrect; the author advocates for citizens to "question" the law when it strays from justice.
  • Option 4: "All moral actions are illegal" – This is an overgeneralization. The passage only discusses specific cases where morality and law diverged.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 543

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage: The relationship between morality and legality is neither linear nor synonymous. Though often conflated in everyday discourse, they belong to distinct conceptual realms. Legality refers to conformity with codified rules enforced by the state, whereas morality is guided by principles of right and wrong, which are often subjective and culturally contingent. The divergence between what is legal and what is moral forms one of the most enduring dilemmas in jurisprudence and civil ethics. Laws, by their very nature, are prescriptive and institutionalized, grounded in the need for order, predictability, and enforceability. Yet, legal codes are ultimately constructed within specific historical, political, and social contexts, and thus may reflect prevailing power structures more than universal justice. For instance, colonial laws legalizing racial segregation or past statutes criminalizing homosexuality demonstrate how legality can institutionalize what many later recognize as moral failures. Conversely, acts of civil disobedience—illegal by definition—often draw moral legitimacy from a higher ethical calling. Mahatma Gandhi's Salt March or Rosa Parks' defiance on a segregated bus were technically unlawful, yet they served as moral catalysts for transformative legal reform. This underscores a vital point: legality does not always equate to justice, and at times, morality must challenge the law to realign it with evolving human values. However, conflating morality with legality can be equally dangerous. In pluralistic societies, what constitutes "moral" varies widely across cultures, religions, and ideologies. If law were to enforce a singular moral worldview, it would risk descending into authoritarianism or theocracy. Hence, modern democratic legal systems are designed to be procedurally neutral, relying on constitutional frameworks that protect individual rights while accommodating moral diversity. The tension between morality and legality is also palpable in emerging debates around technology, bioethics, and freedom of expression. Laws often lag behind technological advances, creating grey zones where ethical concerns arise before legal clarity is established. Consider data privacy or artificial intelligence—practices that may be legal today but pose moral quandaries about consent, autonomy, and manipulation. Ultimately, an ideal legal system should neither operate in moral vacuum nor serve as a mere extension of moral absolutism. Instead, it must strike a delicate balance—upholding constitutional values while remaining responsive to the ethical pulse of the time. Citizens, too, bear a responsibility: to not only obey the law but to question it when it stagnates or strays from principles of justice.

According to the passage, what risk arises from equating morality with legality in pluralistic societies?

  1. AOption (a)

    Laws will be outdated

  2. BOption (b)

    Citizens will become immoral

  3. COption (c)

    It may lead to authoritarian imposition of a singular worldview

  4. DOption (d)

    Democracy will flourish

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (c)C.

It may lead to authoritarian imposition of a singular worldview

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is Option 3.

 

Key Points

  • The passage specifically addresses the dangers of merging these two concepts in the middle paragraph.
  • It notes that in pluralistic societies, morality is not a monolith; it varies across "cultures, religions, and ideologies."
  • The author warns: "If law were to enforce a singular moral worldview, it would risk descending into authoritarianism or theocracy."
  • This aligns precisely with Option 3, as it highlights the threat to diversity and freedom when one moral viewpoint is legally mandated.

Therefore, the correct answer is 3.

 

 

Analytical Insight: In competitive exams, identifying "authoritarianism" as a consequence of enforcing a "singular worldview" is a common theme in political philosophy passages. The text argues for procedural neutrality—the idea that the law should provide a framework for everyone to coexist without forcing one person's morality on another.

 

Additional Information

  • Option 1: "Laws will be outdated" – While the passage mentions laws can lag behind technology, this is not the specific risk linked to pluralism and moral imposition.
  • Option 2: "Citizens will become immoral" – The passage does not suggest that the structure of the law dictates the personal morality of the citizens.
  • Option 4: "Democracy will flourish" – This is the opposite of what the passage states; the author suggests democracy relies on accommodating moral diversity rather than equating it with law.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 544

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage: The relationship between morality and legality is neither linear nor synonymous. Though often conflated in everyday discourse, they belong to distinct conceptual realms. Legality refers to conformity with codified rules enforced by the state, whereas morality is guided by principles of right and wrong, which are often subjective and culturally contingent. The divergence between what is legal and what is moral forms one of the most enduring dilemmas in jurisprudence and civil ethics. Laws, by their very nature, are prescriptive and institutionalized, grounded in the need for order, predictability, and enforceability. Yet, legal codes are ultimately constructed within specific historical, political, and social contexts, and thus may reflect prevailing power structures more than universal justice. For instance, colonial laws legalizing racial segregation or past statutes criminalizing homosexuality demonstrate how legality can institutionalize what many later recognize as moral failures. Conversely, acts of civil disobedience—illegal by definition—often draw moral legitimacy from a higher ethical calling. Mahatma Gandhi's Salt March or Rosa Parks' defiance on a segregated bus were technically unlawful, yet they served as moral catalysts for transformative legal reform. This underscores a vital point: legality does not always equate to justice, and at times, morality must challenge the law to realign it with evolving human values. However, conflating morality with legality can be equally dangerous. In pluralistic societies, what constitutes "moral" varies widely across cultures, religions, and ideologies. If law were to enforce a singular moral worldview, it would risk descending into authoritarianism or theocracy. Hence, modern democratic legal systems are designed to be procedurally neutral, relying on constitutional frameworks that protect individual rights while accommodating moral diversity. The tension between morality and legality is also palpable in emerging debates around technology, bioethics, and freedom of expression. Laws often lag behind technological advances, creating grey zones where ethical concerns arise before legal clarity is established. Consider data privacy or artificial intelligence—practices that may be legal today but pose moral quandaries about consent, autonomy, and manipulation. Ultimately, an ideal legal system should neither operate in moral vacuum nor serve as a mere extension of moral absolutism. Instead, it must strike a delicate balance—upholding constitutional values while remaining responsive to the ethical pulse of the time. Citizens, too, bear a responsibility: to not only obey the law but to question it when it stagnates or strays from principles of justice.

What challenge does the passage highlight in the legal treatment of emerging technologies?

  1. AOption (a)

    Technology reduces legal violations

  2. BOption (b)

    All ethical dilemmas are solved by law

  3. COption (c)

    Laws often precede moral considerations

  4. DOption (d)

    Ethics arise before legal frameworks are formed

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (d)D.

Ethics arise before legal frameworks are formed

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is Option 4.

 

Key Points

  • The final paragraph of the passage discusses the relationship between law and technological progress.
  • It explicitly states: "Laws often lag behind technological advances, creating grey zones where ethical concerns arise before legal clarity is established."
  • This indicates that the challenge is a timing gap: technology moves fast, leading to moral/ethical questions (like data privacy and AI manipulation) long before the state can codify rules to address them.
  • Option 4 accurately reflects this idea that ethics and moral quandaries precede the formation of corresponding legal frameworks.

Therefore, the correct answer is 4.

 

 

Analytical Insight: In competitive exams, understanding the "time-lag" in jurisprudence is a sophisticated reading comprehension theme. The passage uses terms like "grey zones" to describe the period where a practice is technically legal but ethically questionable. Option 3 is a direct reversal of the passage's logic—laws lag behind, they do not precede.

 

Additional Information

  • Option 1: "Technology reduces legal violations" – Not mentioned; the text suggests technology creates new types of dilemmas.
  • Option 2: "All ethical dilemmas are solved by law" – Contradicted by the text, which says laws often "lag behind" and can even "institutionalize moral failures."
  • Option 3: "Laws often precede moral considerations" – The exact opposite of what the passage states; the author notes that ethical concerns arise before legal clarity.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 545

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage: The relationship between morality and legality is neither linear nor synonymous. Though often conflated in everyday discourse, they belong to distinct conceptual realms. Legality refers to conformity with codified rules enforced by the state, whereas morality is guided by principles of right and wrong, which are often subjective and culturally contingent. The divergence between what is legal and what is moral forms one of the most enduring dilemmas in jurisprudence and civil ethics. Laws, by their very nature, are prescriptive and institutionalized, grounded in the need for order, predictability, and enforceability. Yet, legal codes are ultimately constructed within specific historical, political, and social contexts, and thus may reflect prevailing power structures more than universal justice. For instance, colonial laws legalizing racial segregation or past statutes criminalizing homosexuality demonstrate how legality can institutionalize what many later recognize as moral failures. Conversely, acts of civil disobedience—illegal by definition—often draw moral legitimacy from a higher ethical calling. Mahatma Gandhi's Salt March or Rosa Parks' defiance on a segregated bus were technically unlawful, yet they served as moral catalysts for transformative legal reform. This underscores a vital point: legality does not always equate to justice, and at times, morality must challenge the law to realign it with evolving human values. However, conflating morality with legality can be equally dangerous. In pluralistic societies, what constitutes "moral" varies widely across cultures, religions, and ideologies. If law were to enforce a singular moral worldview, it would risk descending into authoritarianism or theocracy. Hence, modern democratic legal systems are designed to be procedurally neutral, relying on constitutional frameworks that protect individual rights while accommodating moral diversity. The tension between morality and legality is also palpable in emerging debates around technology, bioethics, and freedom of expression. Laws often lag behind technological advances, creating grey zones where ethical concerns arise before legal clarity is established. Consider data privacy or artificial intelligence—practices that may be legal today but pose moral quandaries about consent, autonomy, and manipulation. Ultimately, an ideal legal system should neither operate in moral vacuum nor serve as a mere extension of moral absolutism. Instead, it must strike a delicate balance—upholding constitutional values while remaining responsive to the ethical pulse of the time. Citizens, too, bear a responsibility: to not only obey the law but to question it when it stagnates or strays from principles of justice.

What is the author's ultimate recommendation regarding the interplay of law and morality?

  1. AOption (a)

    Laws should replace moral reasoning

  2. BOption (b)

    Citizens must obey all laws blindly

  3. COption (c)

    Law and morality should be entirely separate

  4. DOption (d)

    Law must balance justice with moral responsiveness

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (d)D.

Law must balance justice with moral responsiveness

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is Option 4.

 

Key Points

  • The final paragraph of the passage synthesizes the author's primary argument and provides a concluding recommendation.
  • The author explicitly states: "Ultimately, an ideal legal system should neither operate in moral vacuum nor serve as a mere extension of moral absolutism."
  • Instead, the author suggests that the system "must strike a delicate balance—upholding constitutional values while remaining responsive to the ethical pulse of the time."
  • This highlights that while the law must remain a stable framework (justice/constitutional values), it cannot be static and must evolve alongside society's moral progress (moral responsiveness).
  • Additionally, the passage ends with a call to action for citizens to "question [the law] when it stagnates or strays from principles of justice," further supporting the idea of a responsive system.

Therefore, the correct answer is 4.

 

 

Analytical Insight: In competitive exams, questions about the "author's recommendation" or "conclusion" require looking at the final sentences where the "ideal" state is described. Option 3 is a common trap; while the passage says they belong to "distinct realms," the author's final recommendation is not total separation, but a delicate balance.

 

Additional Information

  • Option 1: "Laws should replace moral reasoning" – The passage contradicts this by stating citizens have a responsibility to question the law using their sense of justice.
  • Option 2: "Citizens must obey all laws blindly" – This is directly refuted by the mention of civil disobedience (Gandhi and Rosa Parks) as a moral catalyst.
  • Option 3: "Law and morality should be entirely separate" – While the passage acknowledges they are distinct, it argues an ideal system shouldn't operate in a "moral vacuum," implying some necessary connection.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 546

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech.

He said, "The sun rises in the east."

  1. AOption (a)

    He said that the sun rose in the east.

  2. BOption (b)

    He said that the sun has risen in the east.

  3. COption (c)

    He said that the sun rises in the east.

  4. DOption (d)

    He said that the sun had risen in the east.

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (c)C.

He said that the sun rises in the east.

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '3' i.e. He said that the sun rises in the east .

Key Points

  • The given sentence is a universal truth: "The sun rises in the east."
  • When converting direct speech to indirect speech, universal truths are kept in the present tense, as they do not change over time.
  • In this case, the verb "rises" remains in the present tense, as it represents a general fact.

Correct sentence: He said that the sun rises in the east.

Additional Information

  • Direct and Indirect Speech Rules for Universal Truths:
  • Universal truths and facts always remain in the present tense, irrespective of the reporting verb's tense.
  • Example: Direct - "Water boils at 100 degrees Celsius." Indirect - He said that water boils at 100 degrees Celsius.
  • Other Tense Changes in Indirect Speech:
  • Simple Present changes to Simple Past.
  • Present Continuous changes to Past Continuous.
  • Present Perfect changes to Past Perfect, etc.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 547

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech.

She said, "Why didn't you tell me the truth earlier?"

  1. AOption (a)

    She asked why I hadn't told her the truth earlier.

  2. BOption (b)

    She asked why hadn't I told her the truth earlier.

  3. COption (c)

    She said why I didn't tell her the truth earlier.

  4. DOption (d)

    She questioned why did I not tell her the truth.

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (a)A.

She asked why I hadn't told her the truth earlier.

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '1' i.e. She asked why I hadn’t told her the truth earlier. .

Key Points

  • The given sentence is in direct speech and is a question.
  • To convert direct speech into indirect speech for a question, the question form changes into a statement form.
  • The reporting verb "said" changes to "asked" since it is a question.
  • The auxiliary verb "did" is removed, and the verb "tell" is changed into its past perfect form "hadn't told."
  • The pronouns are changed appropriately: "you" becomes "I," and "me" becomes "her."

Correct sentence: She asked why I hadn’t told her the truth earlier.

Additional Information

  • Options 2, 3, and 4 are grammatically incorrect for the following reasons:
  • Option 2: "why hadn't I told her" - Incorrect word order for indirect speech questions.
  • Option 3: "why I didn’t tell her" - Incorrect tense; past simple should change to past perfect.
  • Option 4: "why did I not tell her" - Incorrect as it retains the question form, which is not used in indirect speech.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 548

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

A sentence is provided in indirect speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding direct speech.

The analyst said that had the policies been amended earlier, the crisis could have been avoided.

  1. AOption (a)

    "If the policies were amended earlier, the crisis could have been avoided," said the analyst.

  2. BOption (b)

    "Had the policies been amended earlier, the crisis could have been avoided," said the analyst.

  3. COption (c)

    "If only the policies would be amended, the crisis was avoided," he said.

  4. DOption (d)

    "Had we amended the policies, we avoided the crisis," the analyst said.

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

"Had the policies been amended earlier, the crisis could have been avoided," said the analyst.

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '2' i.e. "Had the policies been amended earlier, the crisis could have been avoided," said the analyst.

Key Points

  • The given sentence in indirect speech refers to a hypothetical situation in the past. The structure suggests a third conditional sentence.
  • The third conditional structure is "If + Past Perfect, would have + past participle", which is used to talk about unreal past situations and their imagined outcomes.
  • Option 2 correctly maintains the third conditional structure and accurately conveys the meaning of the original indirect speech sentence.

Correct sentence: "Had the policies been amended earlier, the crisis could have been avoided," said the analyst.

Additional Information

  • 1st Conditional Sentence:
  • Structure: If + Present Simple, will + base verb.
  • Example: If it rains, we will cancel the picnic.
  • Usage: Describes real or possible situations in the future with likely outcomes.
  • 2nd Conditional Sentence:
  • Structure: If + Past Simple, would + base verb.
  • Example: If I were rich, I would travel the world.
  • Usage: Refers to unreal or hypothetical present or future situations.
  • 3rd Conditional Sentence:
  • Structure: If + Past Perfect, would have + past participle.
  • Example: If she had studied harder, she would have passed the exam.
  • Usage: Refers to unreal past situations and their imagined outcomes.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 549

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Rearrange the following sentences to form a coherent paragraph:

  1. This process, a crucial part of the water cycle, ensures that freshwater resources are replenished and distributed globally. 2. The sun's energy drives the evaporation of water from oceans, lakes, and rivers. 3. When the moist air cools, it condenses to form clouds, which then release the water back to the Earth as precipitation. 4. The resulting water vapor then rises into the atmosphere, carried by air currents.
  1. AOption (a)

    2, 4, 3, 1

  2. BOption (b)

    1, 2, 4, 3

  3. COption (c)

    4, 3, 2, 1

  4. DOption (d)

    3, 2, 1, 4

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (a)A.

2, 4, 3, 1

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '1' i.e. 2, 4, 3, 1 .

Key Points

Getty Images

  • Sentence 2 (The Start): This sentence introduces the primary driver of the cycle—the sun's energy—and the initial action of evaporation. It sets the foundation for the sequence.
  • Sentence 4 (The Continuation): This follows by explaining what happens to the "resulting water vapor" mentioned in sentence 2. It describes the vapor rising into the atmosphere.
  • Sentence 3 (The Transformation): This describes the next stage where the vapor condenses into clouds and eventually falls back to Earth as precipitation.
  • Sentence 1 (The Conclusion): This summarizes the entire cycle. The phrase "This process" refers to the collective actions described in 2, 4, and 3, highlighting the overall benefit of replenishing freshwater.

Full Arranged Paragraph: The sun's energy drives the evaporation of water from oceans, lakes, and rivers. The resulting water vapor then rises into the atmosphere, carried by air currents. When the moist air cools, it condenses to form clouds, which then release the water back to the Earth as precipitation. This process, a crucial part of the water cycle, ensures that freshwater resources are replenished and distributed globally.

Additional Information

  • Keyword Links:
  • Evaporation (2) leads to Water Vapor (4).
  • Atmosphere (4) leads to Condensation/Clouds (3).
  • This process (1) acts as a concluding summary for the cycle.
  • Chronological Order: In environmental science and geography para jumbles, sentences usually follow the natural physical sequence of the phenomenon being described.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 1) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 550

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Rearrange the following sentences in correct order to make a logical passage.

  1. This requires strong leadership and teamwork.
  2. Organizational change is often met with resistance.
  3. Effective communication strategies are essential for a smooth transition.
  4. It is a necessary process for growth and adaptation.
  1. AOption (a)

    2-1-3-4

  2. BOption (b)

    2-3-1-4

  3. COption (c)

    3-4-2-1

  4. DOption (d)

    4-2-1-3

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

2-3-1-4

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '2' i.e. 2-3-1-4 .

Key Points

  • Opening Sentence: Sentence 2 introduces the main subject (Organizational change) and a common problem (resistance), making it a perfect starting point.
  • Logical Connection: Sentence 3 follows sentence 2 by providing a remedy (communication strategies) for the resistance.
  • Pronoun Reference: Sentence 1 starts with "This," which acts as a pointer to the collective effort of strategy and communication discussed in previous lines.
  • Conclusion: Sentence 4 uses the pronoun "It" to refer back to the entire concept of change, closing the passage with its ultimate purpose (growth and adaptation).
  • Rearranged paragraph: Organizational change is often met with resistance. Effective communication strategies are essential for a smooth transition. This requires strong leadership and teamwork. It is a necessary process for growth and adaptation.

Additional Information

  • Para Jumble Tips:
  • Look for Introductory Sentences that don't start with pronouns like 'He', 'It', or 'This'.
  • Identify Mandatory Pairs (sentences that must follow each other based on keywords).
  • Check the Chronological or Logical flow (Problem → Solution → Conclusion).
  • Vocabulary:
  • Resistance (Hindi meaning: प्रतिरोध / विरोध - Pratirodh / Virodh): The refusal to accept or comply with something.
  • Adaptation (Hindi meaning: अनुकूलन - Anukoolan): The process of changing to suit different conditions.
  • Essential (Hindi meaning: आवश्यक - Aavashyak): Absolutely necessary; extremely important.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 551

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Select the most appropriate synonym of the given word: CIRCUMSPECT

  1. AOption (a)

    Reckless

  2. BOption (b)

    Brash

  3. COption (c)

    Carefree

  4. DOption (d)

    Cautious

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (d)D.

Cautious

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Cautious.

Key Points

  • The word "circumspect" means being wary and unwilling to take risks; thinking carefully about possible risks before doing or saying something. (सावधान/सोच-समझकर)
  • Example: She was circumspect about revealing her personal information to strangers.
  • The word "cautious" means being careful to avoid potential problems or dangers. (सतर्क)
  • Example: He took a cautious approach to investing his money in the stock market.
  • Hence, "circumspect" and "cautious" share similar meanings, making "cautious" the most appropriate synonym.

Therefore, the correct answer is: Cautious.

Additional Information

Here are the other options explained along with their Hindi meanings and example sentences:

  • Reckless (लापरवाह): Acting without thinking or caring about the consequences.
  • Example: Driving recklessly in heavy traffic can lead to serious accidents.
  • Brash (अत्यधिक आत्मविश्वासी और आक्रामक): Being self-assertive in a rude, noisy, or overconfident way.
  • Example: His brash attitude often annoyed his colleagues.
  • Carefree (बिना चिंता के): Free from worries or responsibilities.
  • Example: During their vacation, they enjoyed a carefree week on the beach.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 552

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Select the most appropriate antonym of the given word. Obdurate

  1. AOption (a)

    Callous

  2. BOption (b)

    Yielding

  3. COption (c)

    Adamant

  4. DOption (d)

    Hardened

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

Yielding

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Yielding.

Key Points

  • The word "Obdurate" means stubbornly refusing to change one's opinion or course of action, even in the face of reason or persuasion. (हठी, अडिग)
  • Example: Despite numerous pleas for mercy, the obdurate judge refused to reduce the sentence.
  • "Yielding" refers to being inclined to give way to the wishes of others or being flexible and accommodating. (झुकने वाला, लचीला)
  • Example: She was yielding in her approach, always ready to adapt to others' needs.
  • Hence, we can infer that the opposite of 'Obdurate' is 'Yielding'.

Therefore, the correct answer is: Yielding.

Additional Information

Here are the other options explained along with their Hindi meanings and example sentences:

  • Callous (निर्दयी): Insensitive and cruel disregard for others.
  • Example: His callous comments about the tragedy upset everyone at the gathering.
  • Adamant (अडिग): Refusing to be persuaded or to change one's mind.
  • Example: She was adamant about finishing the project despite the challenges.
  • Hardened (सख्त): Having become or made hard or unfeeling, especially as a result of experience.
  • Example: Years of hardship had hardened him, making him less empathetic.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 553

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Choose the correct meaning of idiom:

Hand and glove

  1. AOption (a)

    Working in rivalry

  2. BOption (b)

    Acting carelessly

  3. COption (c)

    Very closely associated

  4. DOption (d)

    Openly suspicious

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (c)C.

Very closely associated

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Option 3 i.e. "Very closely associated".

Key Points

  • The idiom "Hand and glove" means to be very closely associated, working in close cooperation, or in harmony with someone. (बहुत निकटता से संबंधित होना या सहयोग करना)
  • Example: The two companies worked hand and glove to deliver the best customer experience.
  • The correct meaning of the idiom "Hand and glove" is "very closely associated" (बहुत निकटता से संबंधित).
  • Example: The detective and his assistant were hand and glove in solving the mystery.

Therefore, the correct answer is: Option 3 i.e. "Very closely associated".

Additional Information

Here are the other options explained along with their Hindi meanings and example sentences:

  • Option 1: Working in rivalry (प्रतिद्वंद्विता में काम करना):
  • Explanation: This means competing against each other, which is contrary to the meaning of "hand and glove".
  • Example: The two teams were working in rivalry to win the championship.
  • Option 2: Acting carelessly (लापरवाही से कार्य करना):
  • Explanation: This refers to behaving in a careless or inattentive manner, which does not align with the idiom's meaning.
  • Example: He was acting carelessly and missed the important details in the report.
  • Option 4: Openly suspicious (खुले तौर पर संदेह करना):
  • Explanation: This means being openly doubtful or distrustful, which is unrelated to the meaning of "hand and glove".
  • Example: She was openly suspicious of his intentions during the meeting.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 554

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Choose the correct meaning of idiom:

Currying favour

  1. AOption (a)

    Seeking emotional validation

  2. BOption (b)

    Seeking approval through flattery

  3. COption (c)

    Avoiding direct confrontation

  4. DOption (d)

    Asking for forgiveness subtly

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

Seeking approval through flattery

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Option 2 i.e. Seeking approval through flattery.

Key Points

  • The idiom "Currying favour" means seeking approval or advantage from someone through excessive flattery or trying to please them. (खुशामद करके पक्ष लेना)
  • Example: He was currying favour with his boss by always complimenting her ideas.
  • Explanation of the correct option: "Seeking approval through flattery" is the appropriate meaning of the idiom "currying favour." It represents the act of gaining someone’s favor by being overly pleasing or flattering. (खुशामद के माध्यम से स्वीकृति प्राप्त करना)
  • Example: The employee tried currying favour with the manager to secure a promotion.

Therefore, the correct answer is: Option 2.

Additional Information

Here are the other options explained along with their Hindi meanings and example sentences:

  • Option 1: Seeking emotional validation (भावनात्मक मान्यता प्राप्त करना): The act of wanting confirmation or approval for one’s emotions or feelings.
  • Example: She constantly seeks emotional validation from her friends.
  • Option 3: Avoiding direct confrontation (प्रत्यक्ष टकराव से बचना): Refers to steering clear of any direct conflict or argument.
  • Example: Instead of addressing the issue, he avoided direct confrontation with his colleagues.
  • Option 4: Asking for forgiveness subtly (धीरे-धीरे माफी मांगना): Refers to apologizing in an indirect or subtle way.
  • Example: She asked for forgiveness subtly by leaving a heartfelt note on his desk.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 555

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Choose the correct spelling for a word meaning 'concise and forcefully expressive'.

  1. AOption (a)

    Pithy

  2. BOption (b)

    Pithey

  3. COption (c)

    Pithhy

  4. DOption (d)

    Pithie

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (a)A.

Pithy

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is option 1.

Key Points

The misspelled word is 'Pithey', 'Pithhy', and 'Pithie'.

  • The correct spelling is 'Pithy'.
  • The word 'pithy' is an adjective meaning 'concise and forcefully expressive' (संक्षिप्त और प्रभावशाली).
  • For Example - She gave a pithy reply that ended the discussion.

Therefore, the correct spelling is 'Pithy'.

Additional Information

Let's understand the meanings of the other options:

  • Pithey - Incorrect spelling of 'Pithy'.
  • Pithhy - Incorrect spelling of 'Pithy'.
  • Pithie - Incorrect spelling of 'Pithy'.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 556

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Choose the correct one-word substitution for: 'A place where wild animals are kept'.

  1. AOption (a)

    Aviary

  2. BOption (b)

    Sanctuary

  3. COption (c)

    Menagerie

  4. DOption (d)

    Park

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (c)C.

Menagerie

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Menagerie.

Key Points

  • The word "Menagerie" refers to a collection of wild animals that are kept in captivity, typically for exhibition. (पशुशाला)
  • Example: The children were excited to visit the menagerie to see the exotic animals up close.
  • "Menagerie" is the correct word for the definition "A place where wild animals are kept." Its Hindi meaning is (पशुशाला).
  • Example: The traveling circus included a menagerie of lions, tigers, and other wild animals.

Therefore, the correct answer is: Menagerie.

Additional Information

Here are the other options explained along with their Hindi meanings and example sentences:

  • Aviary (पक्षीशाला): A large cage or enclosure for keeping birds.
  • Example: The aviary at the zoo houses a variety of colorful parrots and peacocks.
  • Sanctuary (अभयारण्य): A protected area where animals are kept safe in their natural habitat.
  • Example: The wildlife sanctuary is home to numerous endangered species.
  • Park (उद्यान): A public area with greenery, often used for recreational purposes.
  • Example: Families gathered at the park for a picnic on the sunny afternoon.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 557

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Choose the correct one-word substitution for: 'A building where dead bodies are kept temporarily'.

  1. AOption (a)

    Sanctuary

  2. BOption (b)

    Sepulcher

  3. COption (c)

    Crematorium

  4. DOption (d)

    Mortuary

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (d)D.

Mortuary

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Option 4 i.e. Mortuary.

Key Points

  • The word "Mortuary" refers to a building or room where dead bodies are kept temporarily, especially before burial or cremation. (शवगृह)
  • Example: The mortuary at the hospital is well-maintained and ensures dignity for the deceased.
  • "Crematorium" refers to a place where dead bodies are cremated or burned to ashes. (श्मशान)
  • Example: The crematorium was located on the outskirts of the city to maintain privacy for the grieving families.
  • Hence, the correct answer is "Mortuary", as it specifically refers to a temporary place for keeping dead bodies before final rites.

Therefore, the correct answer is: Option 4 i.e. Mortuary.

Additional Information

Here are the other options explained along with their Hindi meanings and example sentences:

  • Sanctuary (शरणस्थल): A safe place or a place of refuge, often used for wildlife or religious purposes.
  • Example: The sanctuary provides a safe haven for endangered species.
  • Sepulcher (मकबरा): A small room or monument, often made of stone, where a dead person is buried.
  • Example: The ancient sepulcher was decorated with intricate carvings.
  • Crematorium (श्मशान): A facility where dead bodies are reduced to ashes by burning.
  • Example: We visited the crematorium to pay our last respects.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 558

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Choose the correct form:

The committee, along with its chairperson, ____ scheduled to meet on Monday.

  1. AOption (a)

    are

  2. BOption (b)

    is

  3. COption (c)

    were

  4. DOption (d)

    have been

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

is

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is 'is'.

 

Key Points

  • The subject of the sentence is "The committee," which is a collective noun that is generally treated as singular in American English.
  • The phrase "along with its chairperson" is a modifier and does not affect the singularity of the subject.
  • Option 1 (are) is incorrect because it is plural, but the subject is singular.
  • Option 3 (were) is incorrect because it indicates past tense, while the sentence is in the present tense.
  • Option 4 (have been) is incorrect because it is in the present perfect tense and does not agree with the singular subject.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 2.

 

Complete Sentence: "The committee, along with its chairperson, is scheduled to meet on Monday."

 

Additional Information

  • Option 1: "are" is incorrect because the subject "The committee" is singular and requires a singular verb.
  • Option 3: "were" is incorrect because the sentence is in the present tense, not past tense.
  • Option 4: "have been" is incorrect because it does not align with the singular subject and the sentence structure.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 559

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Fill in the blank with the correct tense:

They ____ their objections by the time the committee convened.

  1. AOption (a)

    raised

  2. BOption (b)

    have raised

  3. COption (c)

    will raise

  4. DOption (d)

    had raised

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (d)D.

had raised

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is 'had raised'.

 

Key Points

  • The phrase "had raised" is in the past perfect tense, which is used to describe an action that was completed before another action in the past.
  • The sentence indicates that the objections were completed before the committee convened, which makes the past perfect tense appropriate.
  • Options 1, 2, and 3 are incorrect because they do not fit the context of the sentence.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 4.

 

Complete Sentence: "They had raised their objections by the time the committee convened."

 

Additional Information

  • Option 1: "raised" is incorrect because it is in the simple past tense and does not convey the idea of an action completed before another action.
  • Option 2: "have raised" is incorrect because the present perfect tense is not suitable for describing completed actions before another past event.
  • Option 3: "will raise" is incorrect because the future tense does not fit the context of a past event.
SSC CGL 2025 (Held On: 19 Sept, 2025 Shift 2) (Previous Year Paper)·English Comprehension
View full paper

Question 560

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Find the part of the sentence that contains an error:

Neither of the proposed strategies (1)/ seem to address the core issue (2)/ that the committee identified (3)/ during last month's review. (4)/

  1. AOption (a)

    1

  2. BOption (b)

    2

  3. COption (c)

    3

  4. DOption (d)

    4

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

2

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is Option 2.

 

Key Points

  • The verb "seem" is incorrectly used in the sentence. With "neither," which is singular, the verb should be "seems" to maintain subject-verb agreement.
  • The phrase "Neither of the proposed strategies" refers to a singular subject, so the verb must be singular.
  • The corrected sentence should use "seems" instead of "seem" in part 2 of the sentence.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 2.

 

Correct Sentence: "Neither of the proposed strategies seems to address the core issue that the committee identified during last month's review."

 

Additional Information

  • Part 1: "Neither of the proposed strategies" – This part is grammatically correct and does not require any changes.
  • Part 3: "that the committee identified" – This part is grammatically correct and does not require any changes.
  • Part 4: "during last month's review." – This part is grammatically correct and does not require any changes.

How should I prepare for English Comprehension in SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL)?

Solving previous year questions by topic helps identify recurring concepts, question patterns, and frequently asked sub-topics. Attempt each question, review the step-by-step explanation, and note down key formulas or facts for quick revision before the exam.