Consider the following three statements, namely S1, S2 and S3 :
S1. Protecting the environment is an existential exigency for humans, given the impact of environmental degradation on climate change.
S2. Scientific consensus has not been achieved with regard to the extent of the contribution of human intervention to climate change.
S3. Environmental activism includes climate alarmism and other extremist points of view that often become the focus of climate change deniers.
Which of the following relationships based on the statements given above is/are correct?
-
S3 is a counterpoint to S1
-
S3 is unconnected to S1 and S2
-
S2 could be the reason for S3
Select the answer using the code given below.
- AOption (a)
2 and 3 only
- BOption (b)
1, 2 and 3
- COption (c)
1 and 2 only
- DOption (d)
3 only
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
3 only
Why this answer is correct
The logical analysis of the statements and their relationships is as follows:
Statement Analysis:
- S1: Focuses on the existential necessity of protecting the environment due to the impact of climate change.
- S2: Highlights that a scientific consensus has not been reached regarding the extent of human intervention in climate change.
- S3: Describes how environmental activism includes climate alarmism or extremist views, which are then utilized by climate change deniers.
Evaluating the Relationships:
1. S3 is a counterpoint to S1:
This is incorrect. S1 argues for the necessity of environmental protection. S3 describes the nature of certain types of activism and how they are perceived. Describing the flaws or extremes of activism (alarmism) does not logically negate or act as a counterpoint to the fundamental need for environmental protection mentioned in S1.
2. S3 is unconnected to S1 and S2:
This is incorrect.
All three statements are closely thematically linked to the global discourse on climate change. S1 sets the stakes, S2 explains the scientific uncertainty, and S3 explains the socio-political reactions to that uncertainty. They are inherently connected.
3. S2 could be the reason for S3:
This is correct. The lack of scientific consensus (S2) on the exact extent of human contribution creates a vacuum of certainty. This uncertainty often leads different groups to adopt extremist points of view, such as climate alarmism (to spur action despite the uncertainty) or denial (using the lack of consensus as an excuse to reject the phenomenon). Thus, S2 provides the context or reason for the behaviors described in S3.
Conclusion:
Based on the logical deduction, only the third relationship is valid.
Therefore, the correct code is 3 only.
Hence, the correct answer is "Option 4".