Search Previous Year Questions

The correct answer is Option 2.

Key Points

• The term vindicate means to clear someone of blame or suspicion or to justify their actions.
• Its antonym would be a word that conveys the opposite meaning, such as accuse, which means to charge someone with wrongdoing or fault.
• Other options like exonerate, defend, and justify are synonyms or closely related in meaning to "vindicate" and cannot be considered antonyms.
• Thus, the correct antonym of "vindicate" is Option 2: Accuse.

Additional Information

• Option 1: Exonerate – This means to clear someone from blame or fault, making it a synonym of "vindicate."
• Option 3: Defend – This means to support or protect someone, which is similar in meaning to "vindicate."
• Option 4: Justify – This means to show or prove that something is right, which aligns with the meaning of "vindicate."
• Option 5: No error – This option is not relevant to the given question.

The correct answer is Option 3.

Key Points

• The correct preposition to use when referring to a plane landing at an airport is "at." This ensures proper grammatical usage and clarity.
• Options like "to", "into", and "towards" are incorrect in this context because they do not align with how the preposition is used for a location.
• Using "at" indicates that the plane landed at a specific location, the airport, which is the correct phrasing.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 3.

Correct Sentence: "The plane landed at the airport."

Additional Information

• Option 1: "to the airport" – Incorrect because "to" suggests movement towards the airport, not the act of landing.
• Option 2: "into the airport" – Incorrect because "into" implies entering a building or enclosed space, which is not applicable here.
• Option 4: "towards airport" – Incorrect because "towards" indicates direction but not the act of landing.
• No error – This option would only be correct if the original sentence were grammatically accurate, which it is not.

The correct answer is Option 3.

Key Points

• The original sentence is in the passive voice: "All the entries must have been verified by the auditor before submission."
• In the active voice, the subject (the auditor) is the doer of the action.
• The active voice structure ensures that the auditor is explicitly performing the action of verifying the entries.
• Thus, the correct transformation is: "The auditor must have verified all the entries before submission."

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 3.

Correct Sentence: "The auditor must have verified all the entries before submission."

Additional Information

• Option 1: "All the entries are to be verified before submission." – This is in the passive voice, and the modal verb "must" is omitted, changing the meaning.
• Option 2: "The auditor was verifying all entries before submission." – This is not correct as it uses the past continuous tense, which changes the meaning of the original sentence.
• Option 4: "All entries were verified by the auditor." – This is in the past simple tense and passive voice, which changes the tense and meaning.
• Option 5: There is no Option 5 provided in the question.

The correct answer is Option 3.

Key Points

• The paragraph is about the Galápagos Islands and their significance in Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.
• Sentence 2 introduces the topic by mentioning the Galápagos Islands and their connection to Darwin's theory of evolution.
• Sentence 4 builds on this by describing Darwin's observation of finches with distinct beak shapes on different islands.
• Sentence 3 logically follows, explaining how Darwin's observations led to the concept of natural selection.
• Sentence 1 concludes the paragraph by mentioning how these observations contributed to his famous book, On the Origin of Species.

Therefore, the most logical sequence is 2-4-3-1, and the correct answer is Option 3.

Correct Paragraph: "The Galápagos Islands are famous for their diverse wildlife and their role in Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. Darwin observed that finches on different islands had distinct beak shapes suited to their specific diets. This led him to propose the idea of natural selection, where species evolve over time to adapt to their environment. His observations eventually contributed to his groundbreaking book, On the Origin of Species."

Additional Information

• Option 1 (2-4-1-3) is incorrect because sentence 1 prematurely concludes the paragraph before explaining Darwin's concept of natural selection.
• Option 2 (4-2-3-1) is incorrect as it disrupts the logical flow by starting with an observation instead of introducing the topic.
• Option 4 (1-3-2-4) is incorrect because it starts with the conclusion and ends abruptly without a proper introduction to the topic.

The correct answer is Option 3.

Key Points

• The phrase "If I was you" is grammatically incorrect because it uses the verb "was" in a subjunctive mood.
• In hypothetical or unreal conditions, the verb "were" is used instead of "was" with the pronoun "I."
• The correct form is "If I were you," which aligns with the rules of subjunctive grammar.
• The use of "were" indicates a situation that is contrary to reality or hypothetical.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 3.

Correct Sentence: "If I were you, I would accept the offer."

Additional Information

• Option 1: "am you" – This is grammatically incorrect as "am" cannot be used in place of "were" in hypothetical situations.
• Option 2: "have been you" – This is incorrect as it does not fit the context of a hypothetical condition.
• Option 4: "would be you" – This is grammatically incorrect as "would be" cannot replace "were" in this type of conditional sentence.

The correct answer is Option 3.

Key Points

• The sentence compares the abilities of Hari and Sohan in solving mathematical problems, indicating the need for the comparative degree of the adjective.
• The adjective "talented" is used to describe their skill, and its comparative form is "more talented."
• Other options like "most talented" (superlative degree) and "talenter" (incorrect form) do not fit the context of comparison between two individuals.
• Thus, the correct answer is "more talented."

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 3.

Correct Sentence: "Hari is more talented than Sohan in solving mathematical problems."

Additional Information

• Option 1: "most talented" – This is the superlative form, used for comparisons among more than two individuals. It is incorrect in this context.
• Option 2: "talented" – This is not a valid option and is irrelevant to the question.
• Option 4: "talenter" – This is not a grammatically correct word in English.

The correct answer is Option 1.

Key Points

• The preposition "of" is used to indicate the relationship between the soldier and the suspicion of being a spy.
• The phrase "suspected of" is the correct collocation in English grammar.
• Other options, like "after", "by", or "up", do not fit grammatically or contextually in this sentence.
• Therefore, the correct preposition to fill the blank is "of".

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 1.

Correct Sentence: "The soldier was suspected of being a spy and was put behind bars."

Additional Information

• Option 2: "after" – This is incorrect as it does not convey the intended meaning in the context of suspicion.
• Option 3: "by" – This is incorrect as it typically indicates the agent performing the action, not the cause of suspicion.
• Option 4: "up" – This is incorrect as it does not fit grammatically or contextually here.

The correct answer is Option 1.

Key Points

• The phrase "since two months" in the sentence is incorrect because "since" is used to refer to a specific point in time, not a duration.
• To indicate a duration, "for" is the appropriate preposition. Hence, the phrase should be "for two months."
• Replacing "since two months" with "for two months" ensures grammatical accuracy and proper usage of prepositions.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 1.

Correct Sentence: "The team has been preparing for the match for two months without a break."

Additional Information

• Option 2: "in two months" – This option is incorrect because "in" suggests something will happen after a specified period, not during an ongoing duration.
• Option 3: "between two months" – This option is incorrect because "between" implies something happening within two distinct points or periods of time, which does not fit the context.
• Option 4: "No changes required" – This option is incorrect because the original sentence contains an error in the use of the preposition "since."

The correct answer is Option (2) picked me up.

Key Points

• The verb form is incorrect because the sentence begins with “Can you”, which requires the base form of the verb, not past tense.
• Instead of “picked me up,” it should be “pick me up.”
• Correct sentence: “Can you pick me up from the airport?”
• The modal verb “can” is always followed by the root/base form of the verb (e.g., can go, can do, can see).

Therefore, the correct answer is– picked me up.

The correct answer is Option 4.

Key Points

• The word "sentence" is a homonym, meaning it has multiple meanings depending on the context.
• In the original statement, "sentence" refers to a legal judgment given by a judge.
• Option 4, "She wrote a beautiful sentence in her diary," uses "sentence" in a different context, referring to a grammatical unit of language.
• This demonstrates the homonym usage of the word "sentence."

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 4.

Explanation: The homonym "sentence" can mean either a legal decision (as in the original statement) or a collection of words forming a coherent thought (as in Option 4).

Additional Information

• Option 1: "He received a ten-year sentence for the crime." – This uses "sentence" in the same legal context as the original statement.
• Option 2: "The lawyer defended the sentence fiercely." – Again, "sentence" is used in the legal context, not as a homonym.
• Option 3: "The courtroom fell silent during the sentence." – This also refers to the legal judgment, not demonstrating the homonym usage.
• Option 4: "She wrote a beautiful sentence in her diary." – This correctly uses "sentence" as a homonym, referring to a grammatical expression.