Search Previous Year Questions

The correct answer is '2' i.e. that seem to have created should be corrected to 'that seems to have created'.

Key Points

• The subject of the clause is "the uncertainty", which is singular.
• Since the subject is singular, the verb must also be singular. Thus, "seem" must be corrected to "seems."
• The corrected sentence will read: It is the uncertainty of how the council intends to proceed that seems to have created the most unrest among those waiting for regulatory clearance.

Correct sentence: It is the uncertainty of how the council intends to proceed that seems to have created the most unrest among those waiting for regulatory clearance.

Additional Information

• Subject-Verb Agreement Rules:
• When the subject is singular, the verb must be singular (e.g., he runs, it seems).
• When the subject is plural, the verb must be plural (e.g., they run, they seem).
• Common Errors:
• Using a plural verb with a singular subject or vice versa can lead to grammatical errors.
• Always identify the subject of the sentence correctly to ensure proper agreement.

The correct answer is '1' i.e. The new airport will have been opened by 2026.

Key Points

• The given sentence is in the future perfect tense, which is used to describe actions that will have been completed at a certain point in the future.
• To change the sentence from active to passive, the object of the active sentence becomes the subject of the passive sentence.
• The structure of the future perfect tense in passive voice is: Subject + will have been + past participle of the verb.

Correct sentence: The new airport will have been opened by 2026.

Additional Information

• Active Voice Structure: Subject + will have + past participle of the verb.
• Example in Active Voice: They will have finished the project by next week.
• Passive Voice Structure: Subject + will have been + past participle of the verb.
• Example in Passive Voice: The project will have been finished by next week.

The correct answer is '2' i.e. were portrayed.

Key Points

• The sentence states that the protest was peaceful in nature, but the verb “were portrayed” does not match the singular subject “The protest.”
• Since the subject is singular, the correct form of the verb should be “was portrayed”.
• In English, subject-verb agreement is essential: singular subjects take singular verbs, and plural subjects take plural verbs.

Correct sentence: The protest, though peaceful in nature, was portrayed by official channels as instigated by external forces and ideologically driven groups.

Additional Information

• Subject-Verb Agreement:
• Rule: A singular subject requires a singular verb, and a plural subject requires a plural verb.
• Example: The cat jumps (singular subject), but the cats jump (plural subject).
• Common Errors:
• Mismatching singular subjects with plural verbs or vice versa.
• Misidentifying the subject due to intervening phrases or clauses.

The correct answer is '3' i.e. The sculptor captured the tenure of pain in marble .

Key Points

• The given sentence contains the word tenure, which refers to a period of time during which a person holds a position or job.
• To identify the homonym, we look for a word that sounds the same but has a different meaning.
• In option 3, "The sculptor captured the tenure of pain in marble," the word "tenure" is used metaphorically to describe the enduring nature or essence of pain.
• This usage of "tenure" differs in meaning from its use in the original sentence, making it the correct option.

Correct sentence: The sculptor captured the tenure of pain in marble.

Additional Information

• Homonyms:
• Homonyms are words that are spelled and pronounced the same but have different meanings.
• For example: "bat" (an animal) and "bat" (a piece of sports equipment).
• Context Clues:
• To identify the correct sentence, it is crucial to analyze the context in which the homonym is used.
• In this case, "tenure" is used metaphorically in option 3, making it a homonym of the highlighted word.

The correct answer is '1' i.e. Someone presumed that someone had fabricated the evidence before presenting it in court.

Key Points

• The given sentence is in passive voice: The evidence was presumed to have been fabricated before being presented in court.
• To convert it into active voice, we need to identify the subject performing the action ("someone" in this case).
• Option 1 correctly restructures the sentence, retaining the meaning while shifting it to active voice: Someone presumed that someone had fabricated the evidence before presenting it in court.

Correct sentence: Someone presumed that someone had fabricated the evidence before presenting it in court.

Additional Information

• Active Voice: The subject performs the action (e.g., "Someone fabricated the evidence").
• Passive Voice: The subject receives the action (e.g., "The evidence was fabricated").
• When converting from passive to active voice, identify the subject performing the action and restructure the sentence accordingly.

The correct answer is '3' i.e. at dancing .

Key Points

• The word "good" is typically followed by the preposition "at" when referring to skills or abilities.
• The phrase "good at dancing" is the correct and commonly used expression.
• Other options such as "good in dancing", "good with dancing", or "good on dancing" are grammatically incorrect and do not fit the context.

Correct sentence: She is good at dancing.

Additional Information

• Common phrases with "good":
• Good at: Refers to ability or skill (e.g., She is good at cooking.)
• Good with: Refers to handling or interacting with something (e.g., He is good with animals.)
• Good in: Refers to performance in a specific area (e.g., She is good in math exams.)
• Good on: Refers to suitability or appearance (e.g., That color looks good on you.)

The correct answer is '2' i.e. The mentor said, "The fellow persevered even after his hypotheses were repeatedly falsified." .

Key Points

• The given sentence is in indirect speech, where the mentor is reporting an observation about the fellow's perseverance and his hypotheses being falsified.
• When converting from indirect speech to direct speech, it is important to ensure that the pronouns and tense reflect the original speaker’s perspective accurately.
• The correct direct speech sentence should retain the past tense used in the indirect sentence ("had persevered" becomes "persevered") and the appropriate pronoun ("his" instead of "your").
• Option 2 is the most accurate conversion to direct speech: "The mentor said, 'The fellow persevered even after his hypotheses were repeatedly falsified.'"

Correct sentence: The mentor said, "The fellow persevered even after his hypotheses were repeatedly falsified."

Additional Information

• Option 1: Incorrect because it uses the pronoun "your," which changes the meaning and implies the hypotheses belong to the listener, not the fellow.
• Option 3: Incorrect because it changes the sentence structure and tense, making it grammatically incorrect and deviating from the original meaning.
• Option 4: Incorrect because "had persevered" is retained in direct speech, which is unnecessary when reporting a simple past action.

The correct answer is '1' i.e. He said it might rain that day .

Key Points

• When converting direct speech to indirect speech, modal verbs like "may" often change to their past form "might."
• The phrase "today" in direct speech changes to "that day" in indirect speech to match the timeline.
• Option 1 correctly follows the rules of indirect speech conversion, ensuring proper grammatical structure.

Correct sentence: He said it might rain that day.

Additional Information

• Rules for changing direct speech to indirect speech:
• Tense: Present modals like "may" often change to their past form "might."
• Time indicators: Words like "today" change to "that day" in indirect speech.
• Common errors:
• Option 2 retains "may," which is incorrect for indirect speech.
• Option 3 uses "can," which changes the meaning of the statement.
• Option 4 has grammatical errors and incorrect verb usage.

The correct answer is '1' i.e. 2, 1, 4, 3 .

Key Points

• The question requires us to rearrange the given sentences into a coherent paragraph. The logical flow of ideas plays a crucial role in determining the correct order.
• Sentence 2 introduces the general topic of the paragraph by stating that the architecture of a modern computer is a complex arrangement of hardware and software components.
• Sentence 1 follows naturally, as it identifies the central processing unit (CPU) as the most critical component in this arrangement, acting as the "brain" of the computer.
• Sentence 4 elaborates on the CPU's role, explaining how it works in tandem with other components like memory, storage, and peripherals to process data.
• Sentence 3 concludes the paragraph by summarizing the result of this interplay, which enables the computer to perform tasks ranging from simple calculations to complex simulations.

Correct order: 2, 1, 4, 3.

Additional Information

• Logical Coherence: When arranging sentences, it is important to identify the introductory sentence, supporting details, and concluding statement.
• Flow of Ideas: Ensure that each sentence connects logically to the next, avoiding abrupt transitions.

The correct answer is '2' i.e. 2-3-1-4 .

Key Points

• Option '2' is correct because it arranges the sentences in a logical sequence, forming a coherent passage.
• The passage starts with a general statement: Data analytics is transforming modern business, establishing the topic.
• Next, it explains what data analytics involves: It involves collecting, processing, and interpreting large datasets.
• Then, it describes the utility of data analytics: This provides real-time information for decision-making.
• Finally, it concludes with how companies leverage data: Companies leverage data to identify trends and predict consumer behavior.

Correct sentence order: 2-3-1-4.

Additional Information

• Critical Thinking: When arranging sentences, start by identifying the introductory sentence and follow the logical progression of ideas.
• Tip: Look for keywords like "this" or "it" that refer to previous sentences to determine the sequence.