Choose the most suitable option to replace the highlighted part of the sentence: The manager has been dismissed on charges to accept bribes.
- AOption (a)
has been dismissed on charges for accepting bribes
- BOption (b)
has been dismissed on charges of accepting bribes
- COption (c)
was dismissed for accepting bribes
- DOption (d)
had been dismissed on charges of bribing
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
has been dismissed on charges of accepting bribes
Why this answer is correct
The correct answer is 'has been dismissed on charges of accepting bribes'.
Key Points
- The phrase "charges of accepting bribes" is grammatically correct and commonly used to describe such situations.
- Option 1, "charges for accepting bribes," is incorrect because "charges for" is not the proper collocation in this context.
- Option 3, "was dismissed for accepting bribes," changes the tense and does not align with the original sentence structure.
- Option 4, "had been dismissed on charges of bribing," alters the meaning and incorrectly implies that the manager was bribing others.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option 2.
Complete Sentence: "The manager has been dismissed on charges of accepting bribes."
Additional Information
- Option 1: Incorrect due to the improper use of "charges for."
- Option 3: Incorrect because it changes the tense unnecessarily.
- Option 4: Incorrect because it changes the meaning and implies the manager was the one bribing others.