Search Previous Year Questions

The correct answer is 'Option(1)' i.e. 'Expostulation'.

Key Points

• The word "Expostulation" means the act of expressing earnest disapproval or reasoning with someone gently. (हल्की आपत्ति या समझाने का प्रयास)
• Example: Her expostulation with the child was calm and meant to correct his behavior.
• "Expostulation" is the correct spelling that conveys the meaning of mild disapproval or protest. (नरम विरोध)
• Example: He listened patiently to her expostulation about his careless actions.
• The other options contain spelling errors and are not valid English words.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 1.

Additional Information

• Expossulation (गलत वर्तनी): Incorrect spelling; not a valid English word.
• Expostelation (गलत वर्तनी): Incorrect spelling; no meaning in English.
• Expostullation (गलत वर्तनी): Incorrect spelling; not recognized in English vocabulary.

The correct answer is 'Option(4)' i.e. 'Pedant'.

Key Points

• The word "Pedant" refers to a person who is overly concerned with minor details, rules, or formalities, especially in teaching. (शब्दाडंबरप्रिय / सूक्ष्म बातों पर अत्यधिक ध्यान देने वाला)
• Example: The teacher was considered a pedant because he corrected every tiny mistake in punctuation.
• "Pedant" correctly describes someone who focuses excessively on trivial details. (छोटी-छोटी बातों में उलझने वाला)
• Example: He sounded like a pedant when he insisted on perfect grammar in casual conversations.
• The term often carries a negative connotation, suggesting unnecessary emphasis on minor points.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 4.

Additional Information

• Critic (आलोचक): A person who evaluates and judges the merits of something.
• Grammarian (व्याकरणविद्): A person who studies or writes about grammar.
• Scholar (विद्वान): A learned person with deep knowledge in a subject.

The correct answer is 'Option(1)' i.e. 'Abscond'.

Key Points

• The word "Abscond" means to leave hurriedly and secretly, especially to avoid arrest or legal action. (फरार होना)
• Example: The accused tried to abscond after committing the crime.
• "Abscond" correctly describes leaving suddenly and in haste. (जल्दी से भाग जाना)
• Example: He absconded from the office without informing anyone.
• The term is generally used in legal or criminal contexts.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 1.

Additional Information

• Perambulate (टहलना): To walk through or around a place.
• Circumambulate (परिक्रमा करना): To walk all the way around something, especially in a ritual manner.
• Loiter (आवारा घूमना): To stand or wait around without purpose.

The correct answer is '2' i.e. would have received.

Key Points

• The given sentence is an example of the third conditional, which is used to describe unreal situations in the past.
• “Had they submitted” is the inverted form of “If they had submitted,” showing a past perfect structure.
• The structure of the third conditional is Had + subject + past participle, would have + past participle.
• Therefore, the correct verb form to complete the sentence is Option 2.

Correct sentence: Had they submitted the proposal earlier, they would have received the funding.

Additional Information

• 1^st Conditional Sentence:
• Structure: If + Present Simple, will + base verb.
• Example: If they submit the proposal now, they will receive the funding.
• Usage: Describes real or possible future situations.
• 2^nd Conditional Sentence:
• Structure: If + Past Simple, would + base verb.
• Example: If they submitted the proposal earlier, they would get the funding.
• Usage: Refers to hypothetical present or future situations.

The correct answer is Option 2.

Key Points

• The subject of the sentence is “The CEO”, which is singular.
• The phrase “along with his deputies” is a parenthetical phrase and does not change the number of the subject.
• The verb “were” is plural and does not agree with the singular subject.
• The correct verb should be “was” to maintain subject-verb agreement.

Correct sentence: The CEO along with his deputies was present during the final negotiations with the investors and regulators.

Additional Information

• Expressions like along with, together with, as well as do not affect subject-verb agreement.
• The verb always agrees with the main subject, not with the accompanying phrase.
• Example: The manager along with his team is attending the meeting.

The correct answer is Option 3.

Key Points

• The given sentence is in the simple past tense (“damaged”).
• In passive voice, the structure for simple past is Object + was/were + past participle + by + subject.
• The object “many houses” becomes the subject in the passive voice.
• Since “houses” is plural, we use “were damaged”.

Correct sentence: Many houses were damaged by the storm.

Additional Information

• Option 1: “are damaged” – Incorrect tense (simple present).
• Option 2: “had been damaged” – Past perfect tense, not matching the original sentence.
• Option 4: “have been damaged” – Present perfect tense, not suitable here.

The correct answer is Option 2.

Key Points

• The error lies in Part 2 of the sentence.
• In a passive construction involving two distinct subjects ('allegations' and 'procedural lapses'), the auxiliary verb must be repeated for the second subject to ensure grammatical completeness.
• Furthermore, the main clause uses "might have had" (modal + have + past participle), which indicates a third conditional context (unreal past).
• In the third conditional, the 'if' clause must use the past perfect tense (had + past participle). Therefore, Part 2 is incomplete as it lacks the auxiliary verb "had been" to accompany the subject 'procedural lapses'.

Correct sentence: If the allegations had been substantiated and procedural lapses had been proven, the committee might have had enough reason to initiate an internal probe which never occurred.

Additional Information

• Third Conditional: If + past perfect, would/might/could have + past participle. This describes a hypothetical situation in the past and its result.
• When subjects are different in a compound passive sentence, the auxiliary verb cannot be omitted for the second subject if the meaning or tense requires its specific inclusion for clarity.

The correct answer is Option 1 i.e. The welder fitted a steel mitre joint at a 45° angle.

Key Points

• The word "mitre" in the given sentence refers to a ceremonial headdress worn by bishops. (बिशप की टोपी)
• Example: The bishop placed the mitre on his head before the religious ceremony began.
• The homonym "mitre" also refers to a type of joint made by cutting two pieces at an angle, usually 45°, so they fit together neatly. (कोणीय जोड़)
• Example: The carpenter carefully crafted a mitre joint to join the wooden frames perfectly.
• Both words are spelled the same but have different meanings, which makes them homonyms.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 1.

Additional Information

• Option 2: The cardinal's mitre was trimmed in crimson. (बिशप की टोपी) – This refers to the same religious headdress, not a different meaning.
• Option 3: The procession displayed an ancient mitre in a glass case. (बिशप की टोपी) – Again, it refers to the ceremonial headgear.
• Option 4: The children admired the sparkling mitre on the altar. (बिशप की टोपी) – This also refers to the religious headpiece, not a different meaning.

The correct answer is Option 3.

Key Points

• The given sentence is in passive voice, where the focus is on “the findings” rather than the doer of the action.
• The phrase “were interpreted to have been misrepresented” indicates a reporting structure in passive form.
• To convert into active voice, the doer (the spokesperson) must become the subject of the sentence.
• Option (3) correctly shifts the focus to the spokesperson and maintains the intended meaning.

Correct sentence: The spokesperson is believed to have misrepresented the findings in the official release.

Additional Information

• Option 1: Uses “It is believed,” which changes the sentence structure and does not directly convert the subject properly.
• Option 2: Incorrect meaning; it wrongly suggests the official release misrepresented the spokesperson.
• Option 4: Uses “misinterpreted” instead of “misrepresented” and alters the meaning of the sentence.

The correct answer is 'Option 2' i.e. like.

Key Points

• The verb “like” is a stative verb, which expresses feelings or states rather than actions.
• Stative verbs are generally not used in continuous (–ing) form.
• The sentence is in the present tense, so the correct form should be simple present: “I like this movie.”
• Therefore, “am liking” is grammatically incorrect in standard usage.

Correct sentence: I like this movie a lot.

Additional Information

• Option 1: “have liked” – Present perfect tense; does not fit the context of general liking.
• Option 3: “liked” – Simple past tense; changes the meaning and time reference.
• Option 4: “am enjoy this movie” – Grammatically incorrect structure.