Search Previous Year Questions

Find real questions from previous competitive exam papers with answers and solutions.

Leave the keyword blank to browse saved questions for your selected exam, newest papers first. Add a keyword, year or topic to narrow the results.

Browse complete papers
Showing 10 question(s)
Clear

Question 341

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Choose the most suitable option to replace the highlighted part of the sentence:

She told to me the news.

  1. AOption (a)

    told me

  2. BOption (b)

    told for me

  3. COption (c)

    said to me

  4. DOption (d)

    has told to me

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (a)A.

told me

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '1' i.e. told me .

Key Points

  • The verb “tell” is typically followed directly by the object (the person being told) without a preposition. Hence, "told to me" is incorrect.
  • The correct phrasing would be “told me”, as it directly addresses the person being told.
  • Other options like "told for me", "said to me", or "has told to me" are either grammatically incorrect or do not fit the context.

Correct sentence: She told me the news.

Additional Information

  • Difference between "tell" and "say":
  • Tell: Always requires an object (the person being told). Example: She told me the news.
  • Say: Does not require an object (but can use "to" before the object). Example: She said the news to me.
  • Common Usage:
  • Use "tell" for giving information directly to someone.
  • Use "say" for expressing words or speech.

Question 342

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Choose the most suitable option to replace the highlighted part of the sentence:

Neither of the options are suitable for this task.

  1. AOption (a)

    is suitable to the task

  2. BOption (b)

    is suitable for this task

  3. COption (c)

    were suitable in this task

  4. DOption (d)

    is suitable at this task

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

is suitable for this task

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '2' i.e. is suitable for this task.

Key Points

  • The sentence begins with Neither of the options, which refers to two options collectively and takes a singular verb. Hence, the verb "is" is correct.
  • The preposition "for" is appropriate when describing suitability for a task or purpose.
  • Option 2, "is suitable for this task", is grammatically correct and fits the context of the sentence.

Correct sentence: Neither of the options is suitable for this task.

Additional Information

  • When using neither, the verb agreement depends on the context. If referring to two singular nouns collectively, a singular verb is required.
  • For example:
  • Correct: Neither of the students is participating in the event.
  • Incorrect: Neither of the students are participating in the event.
  • The preposition "for" is commonly used to indicate suitability or purpose.

Question 343

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage :

Democracy is frequently extolled as the political system that best guarantees individual liberty. Enshrined in constitutional rights and protected by the rule of law, freedom of speech, association, religion, and conscience are regarded as hallmarks of democratic governance. However, what is less frequently acknowledged—but equally vital—is the reciprocal pillar of responsibility without which such freedoms can degenerate into chaos, polarization, or authoritarian backlashes. Freedom in a democracy is not absolute; it exists within a framework of mutual restraint and civic discipline. The right to express dissent, for instance, is foundational. Yet when freedom of expression is weaponized to disseminate hate speech, misinformation, or seditious propaganda, it ceases to serve the democratic cause. Responsibility thus entails a conscious engagement with the implications of one's actions—not just their legality, but their ethical and civic consequences. The challenge lies in reconciling liberty with accountability in pluralistic societies. With diverse cultural, ideological, and economic constituencies, democracies are inherently sites of contention. In such contexts, responsibility demands more than legal compliance—it requires empathy, critical thinking, and a commitment to collective well-being. A citizen's right to protest, for example, must be exercised with awareness of public order and respect for differing viewpoints. Similarly, the freedom to vote must be matched by an obligation to make informed choices, unswayed by populism, prejudice, or manipulation. The tension between freedom and responsibility is perhaps most visible during moments of crisis—be it a pandemic, a communal riot, or a constitutional standoff. In such times, the temptation to prioritize personal liberty at the cost of collective safety can prove fatal. Refusal to wear masks during a health emergency or the viral spread of unverified news during civil unrest exemplify how unbridled freedom can undermine democratic resilience. Moreover, democracy itself is not self-sustaining; it requires vigilant citizens who recognize that rights are not entitlements in perpetuity, but privileges preserved through active participation. When freedom is divorced from responsibility, democratic institutions become vulnerable to erosion—from within. Demagogues often rise not solely because of state failure, but due to civic apathy or irresponsible use of democratic freedoms by the populace itself. Therefore, in any functioning democracy, freedom and responsibility are not opposing forces but mutually reinforcing imperatives. The preservation of liberty necessitates a citizenry capable of ethical judgment, informed debate, and constructive dissent. In the absence of responsibility, freedom risks transforming from a catalyst of justice into a vehicle of division. Democracy survives not just through the laws it enacts, but through the civic virtues its citizens embody.

According to the passage, what happens when freedom is exercised without responsibility?

  1. AOption (a)

    It enhances legal systems

  2. BOption (b)

    It strengthens civic unity

  3. COption (c)

    It leads to misuse and societal harm

  4. DOption (d)

    It guarantees better governance

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (c)C.

It leads to misuse and societal harm

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is Option 3.

 

Key Points

  • The passage emphasizes that without the "reciprocal pillar of responsibility," freedoms can "degenerate into chaos, polarization, or authoritarian backlashes."
  • It specifically mentions that unbridled freedom can "undermine democratic resilience" and lead to the "viral spread of unverified news" or the "weaponization" of expression for hate speech.
  • The author argues that when freedom is divorced from responsibility, institutions become vulnerable to erosion and can become a "vehicle of division."
  • This clearly points to Option 3, as the result is misuse of rights and harm to the social fabric.

Therefore, the correct answer is 3.

 

Relevant Quote: "In the absence of responsibility, freedom risks transforming from a catalyst of justice into a vehicle of division."

 

 

Additional Information

  • Option 1: The passage suggests that responsibility requires more than just legal compliance; it doesn't say irresponsible freedom enhances the system.
  • Option 2: Irresponsible freedom is described as leading to "polarization" and "division," which is the opposite of strengthening unity.
  • Option 4: The passage notes that demagogues rise and institutions erode when freedom is used irresponsibly, which actively harms governance.

Question 344

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage :

Democracy is frequently extolled as the political system that best guarantees individual liberty. Enshrined in constitutional rights and protected by the rule of law, freedom of speech, association, religion, and conscience are regarded as hallmarks of democratic governance. However, what is less frequently acknowledged—but equally vital—is the reciprocal pillar of responsibility without which such freedoms can degenerate into chaos, polarization, or authoritarian backlashes. Freedom in a democracy is not absolute; it exists within a framework of mutual restraint and civic discipline. The right to express dissent, for instance, is foundational. Yet when freedom of expression is weaponized to disseminate hate speech, misinformation, or seditious propaganda, it ceases to serve the democratic cause. Responsibility thus entails a conscious engagement with the implications of one's actions—not just their legality, but their ethical and civic consequences. The challenge lies in reconciling liberty with accountability in pluralistic societies. With diverse cultural, ideological, and economic constituencies, democracies are inherently sites of contention. In such contexts, responsibility demands more than legal compliance—it requires empathy, critical thinking, and a commitment to collective well-being. A citizen's right to protest, for example, must be exercised with awareness of public order and respect for differing viewpoints. Similarly, the freedom to vote must be matched by an obligation to make informed choices, unswayed by populism, prejudice, or manipulation. The tension between freedom and responsibility is perhaps most visible during moments of crisis—be it a pandemic, a communal riot, or a constitutional standoff. In such times, the temptation to prioritize personal liberty at the cost of collective safety can prove fatal. Refusal to wear masks during a health emergency or the viral spread of unverified news during civil unrest exemplify how unbridled freedom can undermine democratic resilience. Moreover, democracy itself is not self-sustaining; it requires vigilant citizens who recognize that rights are not entitlements in perpetuity, but privileges preserved through active participation. When freedom is divorced from responsibility, democratic institutions become vulnerable to erosion—from within. Demagogues often rise not solely because of state failure, but due to civic apathy or irresponsible use of democratic freedoms by the populace itself. Therefore, in any functioning democracy, freedom and responsibility are not opposing forces but mutually reinforcing imperatives. The preservation of liberty necessitates a citizenry capable of ethical judgment, informed debate, and constructive dissent. In the absence of responsibility, freedom risks transforming from a catalyst of justice into a vehicle of division. Democracy survives not just through the laws it enacts, but through the civic virtues its citizens embody.

Why does the author mention protests and voting as examples?

  1. AOption (a)

    To criticize public participation

  2. BOption (b)

    To show areas where freedom and responsibility must coexist

  3. COption (c)

    To promote legal reforms

  4. DOption (d)

    To support authoritarian models

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

To show areas where freedom and responsibility must coexist

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Option 2. The author mentions protests and voting to illustrate examples where the coexistence of freedom and responsibility is crucial for effective public participation in a democratic society.

Question 345

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage :

Democracy is frequently extolled as the political system that best guarantees individual liberty. Enshrined in constitutional rights and protected by the rule of law, freedom of speech, association, religion, and conscience are regarded as hallmarks of democratic governance. However, what is less frequently acknowledged—but equally vital—is the reciprocal pillar of responsibility without which such freedoms can degenerate into chaos, polarization, or authoritarian backlashes. Freedom in a democracy is not absolute; it exists within a framework of mutual restraint and civic discipline. The right to express dissent, for instance, is foundational. Yet when freedom of expression is weaponized to disseminate hate speech, misinformation, or seditious propaganda, it ceases to serve the democratic cause. Responsibility thus entails a conscious engagement with the implications of one's actions—not just their legality, but their ethical and civic consequences. The challenge lies in reconciling liberty with accountability in pluralistic societies. With diverse cultural, ideological, and economic constituencies, democracies are inherently sites of contention. In such contexts, responsibility demands more than legal compliance—it requires empathy, critical thinking, and a commitment to collective well-being. A citizen's right to protest, for example, must be exercised with awareness of public order and respect for differing viewpoints. Similarly, the freedom to vote must be matched by an obligation to make informed choices, unswayed by populism, prejudice, or manipulation. The tension between freedom and responsibility is perhaps most visible during moments of crisis—be it a pandemic, a communal riot, or a constitutional standoff. In such times, the temptation to prioritize personal liberty at the cost of collective safety can prove fatal. Refusal to wear masks during a health emergency or the viral spread of unverified news during civil unrest exemplify how unbridled freedom can undermine democratic resilience. Moreover, democracy itself is not self-sustaining; it requires vigilant citizens who recognize that rights are not entitlements in perpetuity, but privileges preserved through active participation. When freedom is divorced from responsibility, democratic institutions become vulnerable to erosion—from within. Demagogues often rise not solely because of state failure, but due to civic apathy or irresponsible use of democratic freedoms by the populace itself. Therefore, in any functioning democracy, freedom and responsibility are not opposing forces but mutually reinforcing imperatives. The preservation of liberty necessitates a citizenry capable of ethical judgment, informed debate, and constructive dissent. In the absence of responsibility, freedom risks transforming from a catalyst of justice into a vehicle of division. Democracy survives not just through the laws it enacts, but through the civic virtues its citizens embody.

What is implied about the relationship between citizens and democratic institutions?

  1. AOption (a)

    Citizens cannot influence institutions

  2. BOption (b)

    Institutions are entirely self-preserving

  3. COption (c)

    Citizens play an active role in sustaining democracy

  4. DOption (d)

    Democratic institutions should restrict citizens' rights

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (c)C.

Citizens play an active role in sustaining democracy

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Citizens play an active role in sustaining democracy.

This is correct because democratic institutions rely on active citizen participation to uphold democratic values, ensuring accountability, representation, and the preservation of rights.

Question 346

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage :

Democracy is frequently extolled as the political system that best guarantees individual liberty. Enshrined in constitutional rights and protected by the rule of law, freedom of speech, association, religion, and conscience are regarded as hallmarks of democratic governance. However, what is less frequently acknowledged—but equally vital—is the reciprocal pillar of responsibility without which such freedoms can degenerate into chaos, polarization, or authoritarian backlashes. Freedom in a democracy is not absolute; it exists within a framework of mutual restraint and civic discipline. The right to express dissent, for instance, is foundational. Yet when freedom of expression is weaponized to disseminate hate speech, misinformation, or seditious propaganda, it ceases to serve the democratic cause. Responsibility thus entails a conscious engagement with the implications of one's actions—not just their legality, but their ethical and civic consequences. The challenge lies in reconciling liberty with accountability in pluralistic societies. With diverse cultural, ideological, and economic constituencies, democracies are inherently sites of contention. In such contexts, responsibility demands more than legal compliance—it requires empathy, critical thinking, and a commitment to collective well-being. A citizen's right to protest, for example, must be exercised with awareness of public order and respect for differing viewpoints. Similarly, the freedom to vote must be matched by an obligation to make informed choices, unswayed by populism, prejudice, or manipulation. The tension between freedom and responsibility is perhaps most visible during moments of crisis—be it a pandemic, a communal riot, or a constitutional standoff. In such times, the temptation to prioritize personal liberty at the cost of collective safety can prove fatal. Refusal to wear masks during a health emergency or the viral spread of unverified news during civil unrest exemplify how unbridled freedom can undermine democratic resilience. Moreover, democracy itself is not self-sustaining; it requires vigilant citizens who recognize that rights are not entitlements in perpetuity, but privileges preserved through active participation. When freedom is divorced from responsibility, democratic institutions become vulnerable to erosion—from within. Demagogues often rise not solely because of state failure, but due to civic apathy or irresponsible use of democratic freedoms by the populace itself. Therefore, in any functioning democracy, freedom and responsibility are not opposing forces but mutually reinforcing imperatives. The preservation of liberty necessitates a citizenry capable of ethical judgment, informed debate, and constructive dissent. In the absence of responsibility, freedom risks transforming from a catalyst of justice into a vehicle of division. Democracy survives not just through the laws it enacts, but through the civic virtues its citizens embody.

How does the passage describe the impact of crises on freedom in democracies?

  1. AOption (a)

    Crises validate unlimited liberty

  2. BOption (b)

    Crises show the need for absolute state control

  3. COption (c)

    Crises reveal the dangers of unregulated freedom

  4. DOption (d)

    Crises diminish the value of rights

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (c)C.

Crises reveal the dangers of unregulated freedom

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Crises reveal the dangers of unregulated freedom.

This option aligns with the passage's description that crises highlight the need for balancing freedom with regulation to prevent societal harm.

Question 347

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage :

Democracy is frequently extolled as the political system that best guarantees individual liberty. Enshrined in constitutional rights and protected by the rule of law, freedom of speech, association, religion, and conscience are regarded as hallmarks of democratic governance. However, what is less frequently acknowledged—but equally vital—is the reciprocal pillar of responsibility without which such freedoms can degenerate into chaos, polarization, or authoritarian backlashes. Freedom in a democracy is not absolute; it exists within a framework of mutual restraint and civic discipline. The right to express dissent, for instance, is foundational. Yet when freedom of expression is weaponized to disseminate hate speech, misinformation, or seditious propaganda, it ceases to serve the democratic cause. Responsibility thus entails a conscious engagement with the implications of one's actions—not just their legality, but their ethical and civic consequences. The challenge lies in reconciling liberty with accountability in pluralistic societies. With diverse cultural, ideological, and economic constituencies, democracies are inherently sites of contention. In such contexts, responsibility demands more than legal compliance—it requires empathy, critical thinking, and a commitment to collective well-being. A citizen's right to protest, for example, must be exercised with awareness of public order and respect for differing viewpoints. Similarly, the freedom to vote must be matched by an obligation to make informed choices, unswayed by populism, prejudice, or manipulation. The tension between freedom and responsibility is perhaps most visible during moments of crisis—be it a pandemic, a communal riot, or a constitutional standoff. In such times, the temptation to prioritize personal liberty at the cost of collective safety can prove fatal. Refusal to wear masks during a health emergency or the viral spread of unverified news during civil unrest exemplify how unbridled freedom can undermine democratic resilience. Moreover, democracy itself is not self-sustaining; it requires vigilant citizens who recognize that rights are not entitlements in perpetuity, but privileges preserved through active participation. When freedom is divorced from responsibility, democratic institutions become vulnerable to erosion—from within. Demagogues often rise not solely because of state failure, but due to civic apathy or irresponsible use of democratic freedoms by the populace itself. Therefore, in any functioning democracy, freedom and responsibility are not opposing forces but mutually reinforcing imperatives. The preservation of liberty necessitates a citizenry capable of ethical judgment, informed debate, and constructive dissent. In the absence of responsibility, freedom risks transforming from a catalyst of justice into a vehicle of division. Democracy survives not just through the laws it enacts, but through the civic virtues its citizens embody.

What tone best describes the author's stance on freedom in democracy?

  1. AOption (a)

    Cynical and dismissive

  2. BOption (b)

    Balanced and cautionary

  3. COption (c)

    Indifferent and neutral

  4. DOption (d)

    Overly optimistic

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

Balanced and cautionary

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is: Balanced and cautionary. The author’s tone emphasizes a thoughtful approach to freedom in democracy, reflecting awareness of its complexities and challenges rather than dismissing or overly endorsing it.

Question 348

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Select the correct option for the Direct Speech conversion of the sentence below.

He observed that, had market liquidity vanished entirely, the exchange would have suspended trading.

  1. AOption (a)

    He said, "If market liquidity vanishes entirely, the exchange suspends trading."

  2. BOption (b)

    He said, "Had market liquidity vanished entirely, the exchange would have suspended trading."

  3. COption (c)

    He said, "The exchange will suspend trading if market liquidity had vanished entirely."

  4. DOption (d)

    He said, "If the exchange suspended trading, it was because market liquidity vanished entirely."

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

He said, "Had market liquidity vanished entirely, the exchange would have suspended trading."

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '2' i.e. He said, "Had market liquidity vanished entirely, the exchange would have suspended trading.".

Key Points

  • The sentence provided is in reported speech and refers to a hypothetical situation in the past.
  • It uses the conditional structure "Had + past participle, would have + past participle", which is typical of the third conditional.
  • Option 2 retains the correct meaning and tense of the original sentence while converting it into direct speech.

Correct sentence: He said, "Had market liquidity vanished entirely, the exchange would have suspended trading.".

Additional Information

  • 1st Conditional Sentence:
  • Structure: If + Present Simple, will + base verb.
  • Example: If it rains, we will cancel the picnic.
  • Usage: Describes real or possible situations in the future with likely outcomes.
  • 2nd Conditional Sentence:
  • Structure: If + Past Simple, would + base verb.
  • Example: If I were rich, I would travel the world.
  • Usage: Refers to unreal or hypothetical situations in the present or future.
  • 3rd Conditional Sentence:
  • Structure: If + Past Perfect, would have + past participle.
  • Example: If she had studied harder, she would have passed the exam.
  • Usage: Refers to unreal past situations and their imagined outcomes.

Question 349

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech.

He said, "I am reading a book."

  1. AOption (a)

    He said he is reading a book.

  2. BOption (b)

    He said that he was reading a book.

  3. COption (c)

    He said that he had read a book.

  4. DOption (d)

    He said he read a book.

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

He said that he was reading a book.

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '2' i.e. He said that he was reading a book .

Key Points

  • The given sentence in direct speech is: "I am reading a book."
  • When converting direct speech to indirect speech, the tense of the verb changes depending on the reporting verb.
  • In this case, the reporting verb "said" is in the past tense, so the present continuous tense "am reading" changes to past continuous tense "was reading".
  • Option 2 correctly converts the sentence into indirect speech.

Correct sentence: He said that he was reading a book.

Additional Information

  • Rules for converting Direct Speech to Indirect Speech:
  • If the reporting verb is in the past tense, the tense of the verb in direct speech changes accordingly (e.g., present tense becomes past tense).
  • Words indicating time and place may also change (e.g., "now" becomes "then", "today" becomes "that day").
  • The structure of the sentence changes to remove quotation marks and introduce "that" (optional in some cases).
  • Examples:
  • Direct: She said, "I am cooking." Indirect: She said that she was cooking.
  • Direct: He said, "I will call you." Indirect: He said that he would call me.

Question 350

SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025• English Comprehension• English Comprehension

Rearrange the following sentences to form a meaningful passage:

  1. Solar energy is one of the most promising renewable energy sources.

  2. It has a minimal environmental impact compared to fossil fuels.

  3. Solar panels convert sunlight into electricity.

  4. However, energy storage remains a significant challenge for solar energy systems.

  1. AOption (a)

    2-1-4-3

  2. BOption (b)

    1-2-4-3

  3. COption (c)

    3-2-4-1

  4. DOption (d)

    4-1-2-3

View answer & explanation

Correct answer

Answer: (b)B.

1-2-4-3

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is '2' i.e. 1-2-4-3 .

Key Points

  • The question requires rearranging the given sentences to form a meaningful and coherent passage.
  • The first sentence in the correct sequence is "Solar energy is one of the most promising renewable energy sources" (1), which introduces the topic.
  • The second sentence is "It has a minimal environmental impact compared to fossil fuels" (2), which elaborates on the environmental benefits.
  • The third sentence is "However, energy storage remains a significant challenge for solar energy systems" (4), which points out a challenge associated with the topic.
  • The final sentence is "Solar panels convert sunlight into electricity" (3), which adds a concluding fact about the functioning of solar energy systems.

Correct sequence: 1-2-4-3.

Additional Information

  • When rearranging sentences, it is crucial to identify the introductory sentence, supporting details, and the concluding statement for logical flow.
  • Understanding the theme of the passage helps in determining the correct order of sentences.