Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage:
Cricket, as a sport, has continually evolved in response to changing audience preferences and technological advancements. Among its many formats, Test cricket and One Day Internationals (ODIs) represent two contrasting philosophies—one rooted in endurance and strategy, the other in dynamism and entertainment. Test cricket, often regarded as the pinnacle of the sport, is a format that unfolds over five days, demanding exceptional levels of patience, technique, and mental resilience. It offers players the opportunity to exhibit classical skills and tactical acumen, where the fluctuating tempo mirrors the rhythm of real life—unpredictable, slow-burning, and layered. For purists, Test cricket is an art form, rewarding not merely flamboyance but consistency and grit. In contrast, ODIs compress the drama into a single day. With limited overs, this format prioritizes aggressive batting, innovative bowling variations, and strategic field placements. The adrenaline-infused pace of ODIs appeals to a broader demographic, especially in an era of dwindling attention spans and time constraints. For broadcasters and advertisers, the shorter format offers commercial viability, making it a lucrative spectacle. However, critics argue that the commercialization of ODIs has come at the expense of depth and nuance. In pursuit of viewership, substance often gives way to spectacle. Conversely, defenders of Test cricket lament its declining audience, attributing it to an increasingly entertainment-driven sports culture. Yet, occasional high-stakes encounters—like the Ashes or India-Australia series—still manage to ignite global interest. The ongoing debate between formats is not merely about preference, but about the challenge lies in preserving the sanctity of Test cricket without undermining the accessibility of ODIs—a delicate balance that cricketing authorities must negotiate in the years ahead.
Which of the following is a criticism of ODIs mentioned in the passage?
- AOption (a)
Too long for modern viewers
- BOption (b)
Lack of competitiveness
- COption (c)
Loss of depth due to over-commercialization
- DOption (d)
Fewer international tournaments
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
Loss of depth due to over-commercialization
Why this answer is correct
The correct answer is Option 3.
Key Points
- The passage explicitly discusses the downsides of the shorter format's popularity.
- It states that "critics argue that the commercialization of ODIs has come at the expense of depth and nuance."
- The text further elaborates that in the pursuit of viewership, "substance often gives way to spectacle."
- This aligns directly with Option 3, which identifies the loss of depth due to over-commercialization.
Therefore, the correct answer is 3.
Relevant Quote: "However, critics argue that the commercialization of ODIs has come at the expense of depth and nuance. In pursuit of viewership, substance often gives way to spectacle."
Additional Information
- Option 1: While the passage mentions "dwindling attention spans," it notes that ODIs actually appeal to these viewers because they are shorter, so being "too long" is not a criticism aimed at ODIs.
- Option 2: The passage does not suggest a lack of competitiveness; rather, it highlights "aggressive batting" and "innovative bowling."
- Option 4: The passage does not mention the number or frequency of international tournaments as a point of criticism.