Which of the following is NOT a recommended mitigation step in earthquake-prone areas?
- AOption (a)
Preparing vulnerability maps and public awareness
- BOption (b)
Banning all development in affected states
- COption (c)
Mandatory use of quake-resistant designs
- DOption (d)
Use of light construction materials
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
Banning all development in affected states
Why this answer is correct
The correct answer is Banning all development in affected states.
Key Points
- Banning all development in earthquake-prone states is not practical or recommended as it would hinder economic growth and urbanization.
- Instead of a complete ban, authorities focus on regulating construction activities and enforcing earthquake-resistant standards.
- Earthquake-prone areas often require mitigation strategies like retrofitting old buildings and promoting safe construction practices rather than halting all development.
- The emphasis is on preparation, resilience, and reducing risks through scientific and policy-driven approaches, not on banning progress entirely.
- Global practices in earthquake risk reduction advocate improving construction norms, public preparedness, and effective disaster management systems rather than halting development.
Additional Information
- Earthquake Mitigation Strategies:
- Effective earthquake mitigation focuses on preparedness, response, recovery, and long-term risk reduction.
- Key strategies include retrofitting old structures, enforcing strict building codes, and developing early warning systems.
- International collaboration and research contribute significantly to improving earthquake resilience worldwide.