Consider the two statements on the Periodisation of Indian history for the teaching of India's pasts and choose an appropriate option.
Statement (I):
British historians divided the history of India into three periods : Hindu, Muslim and British.
Statement (II):
This periodisation was based on the idea that the religion of rulers was the only important historical change.
- AOption (a)
Only statement
(I) is true.
- BOption (b)
Only statement
(II) is true.
- COption (c)
Both statements are correct and statement
(II) is correct explanation of statement (I).
- DOption (d)
Both statements are correct but statement
(II) is an incorrect explanation of statement (I).
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
Both statements are correct and statement
(II) is correct explanation of statement (I).
Why this answer is correct
Key Points
- Statement (I) states that British historians divided the history of India into three periods: Hindu, Muslim, and British. This division was indeed implemented during the colonial era when the British were in control of India. British historians, influenced by their colonial perspective, categorized Indian history based on the dominant religious identities of the ruling powers during specific time periods.
- **Statement
(II) provides an explanation for why this periodization was carried out.** It suggests that the sole or primary criterion for dividing Indian history into these three periods was the religion of the rulers. In other words, according to this statement, the religious affiliation of the ruling powers was considered the most significant historical change.
Thus, it is concluded that **Both statements are correct and statement
(II) is correct explanation of statement (I).**