Why do twentieth century advances not seem sustainable?
- AOption (a)
They do not meet the human needs
- BOption (b)
Due to the increased cost of agricultural production
- COption (c)
Because they are outdated for the current times
- DOption (d)
They are useful, but intensive
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
Due to the increased cost of agricultural production
Why this answer is correct
The correct answer is 'Option 2'.
Key Points
- Twentieth century advances in agriculture do not seem sustainable due to the increased cost of agricultural production.
- The passage states: "Since twentieth century advances, given increasing costs, do not seem sustainable..." This directly links the lack of sustainability to increased costs.
- Other options are not supported by the passage.
- Option 1: The passage does not say that the advances fail to meet human needs.
- Option 3: The passage does not mention that these advances are outdated.
- Option 4: The passage does not state that the advances are sustainable because they are intensive.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option 2.
Additional Information
- Option 1: Incorrect, as the passage does not say that advances fail to meet human needs.
- Option 3: Incorrect, as there is no mention of the advances being outdated.
- Option 4: Incorrect, as intensity is not the reason for unsustainability given in the passage.