If ‘→’ denotes increasing order of intensity, then the meaning of the words [simmer → seethe → smolder] is analogous to [break → raze → _______ ] Which one of the given options is appropriate to fill the blank?
- ((a))
fissure
- ((b))
obliterate
- ((c))
fracture
- ((d))
obfuscate
Show Answer
obliterate
Explanation:
The analogy works based on the increasing intensity of the actions described by the words. Here's the breakdown:
- Simmer → Seethe → Smolder:
- Simmer suggests a mild or low-level intensity.
- Seethe indicates a higher intensity, where things are boiling or agitated.
- Smolder refers to something burning slowly with little flame, implying an intense state of heat, though not yet fully destroyed or burnt.
Now, for the analogy of [break → raze → _______]:
- Break suggests a low-level action, where something is damaged or disrupted.
- Raze involves completely destroying or leveling something, a much stronger action.
- The final word must indicate a complete or intense form of destruction.
The appropriate word to complete the analogy is obliterate, which means to completely destroy or wipe out, just as smolder represents a highly intense state of burning.
So, the solution is: break → raze → obliterate






































