How we make exam guidance worth trusting.

Sources first

Time-sensitive claims are checked against primary sources such as official notifications, recruiting bodies, government portals, and published exam documents. Supporting sources can add context, but they do not override an official notice.

AI assists; people are accountable

We may use Azure-hosted GPT-5 mini to organize approved source material, draft explanations, and propose social derivatives. The model is not treated as a source of truth. Drafts pass schema and citation checks before a reviewer approves a Contentful draft.

What we show readers

• Who authored and, where applicable, reviewed the article.
• When the article was published, updated, and last verified.
• Which sources support the important factual claims.
• Whether AI assistance was used in preparation.

Corrections and updates

If an official notification changes or a material error is found, we update the article with a revision note and a meaningful updated date. We do not silently turn an estimate into a fact. Readers can report a correction through the contact page.

Our byline

When no individual educator is the accountable author, the byline is the YourMockTest Editorial Team. We do not invent credentials, testimonials, candidate stories, quotes, or platform metrics.