Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R
Assertion A: Let R ⊂ A × A be a binary relation as defined below:
A= N × N; ((a,b), (c,d)) ∈ R if only if a ≤ c or b ≤ d. This binary relation R is a partial order.
Reason R: A binary relation will be a partial order if this satisfy reflexive, anti-symmetric and transitive property.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
- AOption (a)
Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
- BOption (b)
Both A and R are correct but R is NOT the correct explanation of A
- COption (c)
A is correct but R is not correct
- DOption (d)
A is not correct but R is correct
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
A is not correct but R is correct
Why this answer is correct
The correct answer is A is not correct but R is correct.
Key Points
- Given relation: R ⊂ A × A, where A = ℕ × ℕ and ((a,b),(c,d)) ∈ R ⇔ a ≤ c or b ≤ d
- To be a partial order, relation must be Reflexive, Anti-symmetric, and Transitive.
- Reflexive: For any (a,b) ∈ A, we check (a,b) R (a,b) ⇒ a ≤ a or b ≤ b ⇒ True. Hence reflexive property holds.
- Anti-symmetric test: Take (1,2) and (2,1). (1,2) R (2,1) ⇒ 1 ≤ 2 (True) (2,1) R (1,2) ⇒ 1 ≤ 2 (True) But (1,2) ≠ (2,1). Hence anti-symmetry fails.
- Since anti-symmetry fails, relation is not a partial order. Therefore Assertion A is false.
- Reason R: Definition of partial order is correct. Hence Reason R is true.
Additional Information
- Partial Order Conditions:
- Reflexive: aRa
- Anti-symmetric: aRb and bRa ⇒ a=b
- Transitive: aRb and bRc ⇒ aRc
- Conclusion:
- Relation fails anti-symmetry ⇒ Not a partial order.
- Hence option 4 is correct.