“Everyone is going to the party; you should go too.” This inference commits which kind of fallacy?
- AOption (a)
Ad Populum
- BOption (b)
Equivocation
- COption (c)
Ad Verecundiam
- DOption (d)
Ad Ignoration
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
Ad Populum
Why this answer is correct
A fallacy is a type of arguing which appears to be valid, but actually invalid. The term fallacy comes from the Latin word ‘fallo,’ meaning ‘I deceive.’ The fallacy is the class name given to bad (illogical) arguments. Fallacies are like plastic flowers: They give you the impression that they are valid. But, a student of logic, like a bee, should be able to distinguish between the real (valid) and the artificial (invalid).
Examples: ‘This man is not clever because he cannot talk fast’ or ‘He is not a patriot because he does not wear khadi.’ Any argument of this sort is fallacious.
1. APPEAL TO EMOTION (ARGUMENTUM AD POPULUM) is making use of the feelings and prejudices of people rather than their reason. This is perhaps the most common of fallacies.
Example: In campaigning for election in India one might ask: ‘Should you not vote for the Congress? Did not the congressmen suffer imprisonment for the sake of the country?’ Thus, the speaker appeals to patriotism, an honorable emotion, without clear evidence to appeal to the feelings of his audience. Besides politicians, many others, like advertisers, commit this fallacy.
2. EQUIVOCATION is the fallacy that consists in using words or phrases with two or more meanings, deliberately or accidentally, while formulating an argument.
3.THE APPEAL TO INAPPROPRIATE AUTHORITY (ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM) This is a very common and crafty fallacy because a person who is an expert in one field is taken as an expert in some other, comparatively, unrelated field. If, for example, we take Bertrand Russell, a great authority on philosophy, as an authority on the matter of shoes, we commit this fallacy.
4. MISSING THE POINT (AD IGNORATIO) is diverting attention from the real point at issue. It is arguing beside the point. Example: ‘The object of war is peace; therefore, soldiers are the best peacemakers.’ Even if it is assumed that the object of war is peace, still it does not imply that soldiers are the best peacemakers.
Hence, From the above explanation, it is clear that “Everyone is going to the party; you should go too.” the kind of fallacy stated here is AD POPULUM, because in this kind of fallacy people try to convince us of something, rather than logically relevant reasons.