Which of the following subjects was NOT a part of the Transferred Subjects under the Government of India Act of 1919?
- AOption (a)
Local self-government
- BOption (b)
Police
- COption (c)
Health
- DOption (d)
Education
View answer & explanationHide answer & explanation
Correct answer
Police
Why this answer is correct
The correct answer is Police.
Key Points
- The Government of India Act, 1919 introduced the concept of Dyarchy in provincial governance, dividing the subjects into two categories: Transferred Subjects and Reserved Subjects.
- Transferred Subjects were those subjects administered by ministers responsible to the legislature, such as Local Self-Government, Health, and Education.
- Reserved Subjects were administered by the Governor and his executive council, which were not responsible to the legislature. These included critical areas like Police, Revenue, and Justice.
- The Police was categorized under Reserved Subjects because it was considered crucial for maintaining law and order, which was seen as the responsibility of the British government at that time.
- Hence, the Police was not part of the Transferred Subjects under the Government of India Act, 1919.
Additional Information
- Government of India Act, 1919:
- This act introduced the system of Dyarchy in provinces, marking a significant step towards provincial autonomy.
- It divided provincial subjects into two categories: Transferred Subjects (administered by Indian ministers) and Reserved Subjects (administered by British officials).
- The act aimed to prepare Indians for self-governance through gradual reforms.
- Transferred Subjects:
- Included less critical areas such as Local Self-Government, Health, Education, and Agriculture.
- Indian ministers were made responsible for these subjects, making them answerable to the provincial legislature.
- This was an attempt to involve Indians in governance and administration.
- Reserved Subjects:
- Included critical areas like Police, Justice, and Revenue, which were handled by the Governor and his executive council.
- The British government retained control over these subjects to maintain law and order and safeguard imperial interests.
- These subjects were not answerable to the provincial legislature.
- Impact of Dyarchy:
- Dyarchy was criticized for its inefficiency and complexity, as it created dual authority in provincial governance.
- It led to significant opposition and demands for complete self-rule, eventually paving the way for the Government of India Act, 1935.
- Important Dates:
- The Government of India Act, 1919, also known as the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, was enacted in December 1919.
- The reforms came into effect on April 1, 1921.
Important Points
- Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms:
- These reforms were named after Edwin Montagu, the Secretary of State for India, and Lord Chelmsford, the Viceroy of India.
- The reforms aimed to introduce gradual self-governance in India.
- However, they were criticized for not granting complete autonomy to Indians.
- Government of India Act, 1935:
- This act replaced Dyarchy with provincial autonomy and introduced the concept of a federal structure.
- It marked a significant step towards self-governance, ultimately leading to India’s independence in 1947.